Earlier versions of this product used the TANDEMKROSS Kraken lower name. My original red build dates back to that version. My newer FDE and green builds use the current TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower. The name changed, but the basic idea stayed the same: start with a premium aluminum Ruger Mark IV 22/45 lower, then choose the upper, bolt, sights, optic, and muzzle device that fit the pistol you want to build.

After years with the original Kraken and two newer Cthulhu lowers, I now have three distinct pistols built around the same concept. Each one has a different role. Together, they show that there is no single correct way to complete a TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower build. This is not a parts wish list. These are three Cthulhu/Kraken lower builds I actually own and shoot.

For readers comparing Ruger Mark IV 22/45 build options, the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower makes sense as a premium foundation. It already includes the major controls, leaves the factory Ruger lower intact, and works with a factory Ruger Lite upper, a lightweight Pac-Lite upper, or a short Mamba LLV upper.

Anyone considering one can check the current Cthulhu lower options and pricing directly from TANDEMKROSS.

Why Build Around a TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Lower?

I already knew many of the individual TANDEMKROSS controls before I bought the original Kraken. Another Ruger Mark IV had an upgraded trigger, safety, thumb rest, and related parts. The lower itself was the real question. I wanted to know whether the aluminum frame would make the pistol feel different.

That difference is hard to measure with numbers. I cannot show data proving that I shoot faster or more accurately with the Kraken or Cthulhu lower. After shooting the original Kraken for a while, though, I developed a clear preference for it over the factory polymer lower.

What the Cthulhu Lower Changes

TANDEMKROSS explains the design well. The enlarged trigger guard gives more room for large or gloved hands. Its hooked front adds another point of contact. The textured backstrap also improves the way the pistol sits in the hand. Compared with the factory polymer frame, the Cerakoted aluminum lower feels more substantial.

The takedown system changes, too. TANDEMKROSS replaces Ruger’s push-button takedown with a screw that locks the upper and lower together. Losing the push button may sound like a downside, but it has not been a problem for me. I keep the wrench handy, and I rarely need to separate the upper and lower away from home.

More importantly, the screw has never loosened during use. The upper-to-lower fit has always remained solid.

What Still Needs to Be Chosen

There is little reason to start changing parts inside the current TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower. It already includes the trigger, safety, thumb rest, slide lock, and magazine release. Replacing those parts mostly means chasing diminishing returns.

The more meaningful decisions involve the parts above and in front of the lower. The upper, bolt, sights, optic, and muzzle device do more to define the finished pistol.

The names started as a joke after someone on Reddit compared the red and FDE builds to peanut butter and jelly. The green lower really pops in direct sunlight, so Ca$h Money seemed like the obvious name.

Jelly: The Original TANDEMKROSS Kraken Lower Build

My red pistol, which I call Jelly, uses the original TANDEMKROSS Kraken lower. Other than the Ruger Lite upper, the major components are TANDEMKROSS parts.

The build includes:

• Original red TANDEMKROSS Kraken lower
• Red Ruger Mark IV Lite upper
• TANDEMKROSS Krossfire bolt
• TANDEMKROSS Tempest grips and magwell
• TANDEMKROSS Eagle Eye fiber-optic sights
• TANDEMKROSS Shadow optic mount
• Viridian RFX15 green dot
• TANDEMKROSS Game Changer compensator

This is the fastest-shooting of the three pistols. The grips, thumb rest, safety ledge, optic, and fiber-optic sights all support the same goal: point naturally and get on target quickly.

The Eagle Eye sights work with the optic setup and give me a bright, familiar reference when the dot is not immediately visible. That helps because astigmatism can make red dots bloom. With this setup, I can use whichever sight picture looks clearer at the time.

The Game Changer compensator normally stays on the barrel. Jelly can be used with my suppressors, but it is the least suppressed of the three builds. I may not consciously notice an extra six ounces when holding a .22 pistol, but that weight at the muzzle makes a difference when moving quickly from target to target.

The compensator redirects gas and reduces the small amount of muzzle movement produced by a .22 LR pistol. I have not done controlled testing to quantify that effect. For this build, the bigger benefit is balance. The compensator keeps the muzzle light and preserves the quick handling that Jelly was built around.

Can You Use a Factory Ruger Lite Upper With the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Lower?

Jelly demonstrates that buying the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower does not always mean spending more money on an aftermarket upper.

The factory Ruger Lite upper is an excellent match on its own. Someone who already owns a Ruger Mark IV 22/45 Lite can add the Cthulhu lower and make a substantial change to the way the pistol feels without replacing the upper.

That may be the most practical upgrade path. Buy the Lite first, then add the Cthulhu lower. If you replace the upper later, you still have the factory polymer lower. Instead of ending up with one heavily modified pistol and a pile of unused parts, you have the foundation for two complete pistols.

My earlier articles on building the original TANDEMKROSS Kraken, the Krossfire Ruger Mark IV bolt, and the Eagle Eye fiber-optic sights provide more detail on the individual components used in this build.

Peanut Butter: FDE TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Build

The second pistol is Peanut Butter, as in “Tactical Peanut Butter.” This build started when I acquired another upper and found myself with more uppers than lowers. Around the same time, TANDEMKROSS announced the FDE Cthulhu lower.

The timing made sense, and the FDE version seemed like a good foundation for a field-oriented pistol. In this case, “field pistol” does not mean that I actually get to carry it in a holster while hiking. I have not found a holster that fits the Cthulhu lower with its thumb rest, although I have not looked especially hard.

Instead, Peanut Butter gets used while walking around a large open shooting area with a mountain as a backstop. It is the pistol I use for more measured shots at broken clays, golf balls, empty cans, and other small targets scattered across the area.

The build includes:

• FDE TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower as supplied by TANDEMKROSS
• Six-inch Tactical Solutions Pac-Lite upper
• OEM Ruger bolt
• TANDEMKROSS Sentinel Guide Rod
• TANDEMKROSS Eagle’s Talon Extractor
• Vortex Venom 3 MOA red dot
• Lobos Industries low-profile optic mount

The Pac-Lite upper fits this role well because it is long, light, threaded, and built around a relatively simple round tube. Unlike the Ruger Lite upper, it does not have the same collection of open cuts and exposed edges. In my opinion, that makes it a better choice for a pistol that may get carried in a pack or used around dirt, rocks, and brush. There are fewer openings to collect debris and fewer edges to attract scratches and scrapes.

This six-inch upper does not feel awkward or noticeably change the balance. Before adding the optic, the longer sight radius helped with iron sights. The Vortex Venom eventually replaced them, and I chose the 3 MOA version over the 6 MOA model because this pistol is used for more precise aiming rather than maximum speed.

The Pac-Lite IV article covers the upper in more detail.

TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu With an OEM Ruger Bolt

Peanut Butter still uses an OEM Ruger bolt rather than a complete aftermarket assembly. I added a TANDEMKROSS Sentinel Guide Rod and Eagle’s Talon Extractor.

I no longer recall whether I installed those parts because the bolt was purchased stripped or simply as preventative upgrades. Either way, I did not need to replace the entire bolt. This build shows that an OEM bolt can remain part of a premium Cthulhu configuration while still benefiting from upgraded cycling and extraction components.

TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Optic Mount Choices

The Lobos optic mount is another good example of a build choice involving a tradeoff.

It sits low and is probably the best-looking Ruger Mark IV optic mount available. The Vortex Venom appears integrated into the upper rather than perched on top of a rail. The downside is that the mount fits a single optic footprint, while the TANDEMKROSS Shadow Mount accommodates multiple footprints.

That difference does not need to become a separate debate. The Lobos mount made sense because I already knew which optic I wanted to use. Someone who expects to change optics later may prefer the added flexibility of the TANDEMKROSS mount.

Peanut Butter usually wears a thread protector, but it also gets regular use with the Tactical Solutions Axiom suppressor. The suppressor changes the sound, not the pistol’s role. I still use it for the same slower, deliberate shooting.

Ca$h Money: Suppressed TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Build

The green pistol is Ca$h Money. I acquired the upper first, which left me with four uppers and three lowers. Since the Mamba LLV was already a premium upper, I wanted to pair it with a premium lower rather than use another factory polymer frame.

The green TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu with black accessories was the obvious choice. I have not changed anything on the lower since it arrived from TANDEMKROSS. It is already exactly what I wanted, and the green-and-black combination looks about 100 times better in person than it does in the product photos.

The build includes:

• Green TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower with black accessories
• Three-inch Volquartsen Mamba LLV upper
• Volquartsen Competition Bolt
• Volquartsen fiber-optic sights supplied with the upper
• SilencerCo Sparrow suppressor

Ca$h Money does not use an optic. The quality fiber-optic sights supplied with the Mamba LLV are more than adequate for what this pistol was built to do.

TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Built for Suppressed Shooting

The three-inch barrel keeps the pistol compact with a suppressor installed. It also keeps ordinary bulk ammunition subsonic.

I tested several brands of bulk .22 LR through this exact pistol using an Athlon chronograph. The highest velocity recorded was only 1,054 feet per second. That result matters because dedicated subsonic ammunition can be more expensive or harder to find. Ca$h Money can remain quiet with Walmart’s Federal bulk rather than depending on a steady supply of CCI subsonic ammunition.

The SilencerCo Sparrow is dedicated to this pistol. Compared with the Tactical Solutions Axiom, the Sparrow is almost an inch shorter while only adding about half an ounce. The shorter suppressor works well with the three-inch upper and helps preserve the compact overall length.

The Sparrow also has an excellent reputation and offers a lot of value for its relatively modest price. I still shoot plenty of 9mm, so every .22 pistol feels light by comparison. I do not really notice the suppressor’s weight when shooting Ca$h Money.

Plenty of Accuracy for Quiet Plinking

The short barrel has not created any practical accuracy or reliability problems.

At our shooting area, the fire department left a long horizontal water tank near the 200-yard line. It is roughly the diameter of a standard propane cylinder used for a gas grill, although considerably longer. I can hit it with this three-inch pistol and its fiber-optic sights.

I would not call Ca$h Money a precision pistol. It does, however, provide plenty of practical accuracy for quiet plinking. It could also be used for hunting or pest control, although less expensive options certainly exist for those roles.

That is the main tradeoff. This is an expensive pistol for what is essentially a dedicated quiet plinker. I would not change it, though. It was built with intent, and every major component supports the role.

Three TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Lower Builds With Different Roles

None of these pistols gets noticeably more use than the others. Each one has a different job.

• Jelly is for shooting fast and moving quickly between targets.
• Peanut Butter is for more measured shots at smaller targets.
• Ca$h Money is for compact, suppressed fun.

The TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower does not lock the owner into one style of Ruger Mark IV build.

Jelly shows that a factory Ruger Lite upper can be an excellent match. Peanut Butter shows how the same lower can anchor a longer, lightweight, optic-equipped outdoor plinker. Ca$h Money shows how far the concept can go with a short premium upper, competition bolt, iron sights, and dedicated suppressor.

In each case, the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower provides the same premium foundation. The upper, bolt, sights, optic, and muzzle device determine how the completed pistol gets used.

TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Lower FAQ

Is the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower the same as the Kraken lower?

The current product sells as the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower. Earlier versions used the Kraken name. My red build uses the original Kraken lower, while the FDE and green builds use the newer Cthulhu lower. Krakens were originally anodized. Cthulhu lowers are Cerakoted.

Can I use a Ruger Mark IV Lite upper with the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower?

Yes. A factory Ruger Mark IV 22/45 Lite upper is an excellent match for the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower. That is the setup used on Jelly, my red Kraken build, and it shows that an aftermarket upper is not required.

Do I need an aftermarket bolt for a TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower build?

Not necessarily. Jelly uses a TANDEMKROSS Krossfire bolt, Ca$h Money uses a Volquartsen Competition Bolt, and Peanut Butter still uses an OEM Ruger bolt with upgraded TANDEMKROSS internal parts. The right bolt depends on the build.

What is the best Cthulhu lower build option?

There is no single best option. A factory Ruger Lite upper makes sense for a practical upgrade, a Pac-Lite upper works well for a lightweight outdoor plinker, and a short Mamba LLV upper is a strong choice for a compact suppressed pistol.

Final Thoughts on the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu Lower

After years with the original Kraken lower and two newer Cthulhu lowers, I have a clear preference for them over the factory Ruger Mark IV 22/45 polymer lower. The difference is not something I can track on a spreadsheet, but it is obvious once I start shooting. The pistol feels more refined, the upper and lower lock together solidly, and the overall experience is simply better.

The price is significant, but the current lower arrives with nearly every control most owners would otherwise add individually. More importantly, buying a complete Cthulhu lower leaves the factory Ruger lower intact. That gives the owner more flexibility and can eventually turn an upper upgrade into a second complete pistol.

The simplest path is still one of the best: start with a Ruger Mark IV 22/45 Lite, then add the TANDEMKROSS Cthulhu lower. The factory upper works extremely well, and there is no requirement to replace it. Anyone starting from scratch with a specific role and a larger budget can choose an aftermarket upper from the beginning.

Either way, the lower is the foundation. The three builds shown here are not the only possibilities. They are examples of what can happen when the same premium Ruger Mark IV 22/45 lower gets configured for speed, deliberate shooting, or suppressed use.

Visit TANDEMKROSS to see the current Cthulhu lower colors, availability, and pricing.

Those facts matter. However, they do not excuse exaggerated or misleading claims.

Too much coverage combines 3D-printed frames, complete firearms, unserialized guns, illegal switches, ordinary Glock pistols, and theoretical firing rates into one frightening story. This approach removes important context. It also makes lawful firearms and their owners part of the threat.

Lawful gun owners do not need to defend switches to question that reporting. We can oppose criminal misuse while still asking journalists and officials to explain the facts accurately.

Ghost Guns Cannot Simply Be Downloaded

News reports often claim that criminals can download and print ghost guns.

What they can download is a digital file.

Depending on the design, that file may let someone print a frame or receiver. Doing so still requires suitable equipment, materials, knowledge, and time. More importantly, a complete and working handgun does not simply emerge from a desktop printer.

A typical Glock-pattern pistol built around a printed frame still needs a slide, barrel, recoil assembly, trigger parts, locking block, rails, sights, pins, springs, and a magazine. Most of those parts must handle heat, pressure, friction, and repeated impact. They are usually conventional metal components that someone must manufacture or purchase separately.

None of this means that a person cannot build a privately made firearm. It means that calling a complete gun “downloadable” skips most of the process.

A person can download plans for a house. That does not mean the person downloaded a house.

The wording matters. Saying that someone can download a gun suggests that almost anyone can click a link, press a button, and receive a working firearm a few hours later. In reality, the process requires many more steps and parts.

The Term “Ghost Guns” Covers Several Categories

The label ghost guns can describe several types of firearms.

It may refer to a gun assembled from a frame or receiver that was incomplete when sold. The term may also describe a firearm built from a commercial parts kit. In other cases, it refers to a gun with a 3D-printed frame or another printed part. Sometimes it simply means a privately made firearm without a serial number from a licensed manufacturer.

Those categories overlap, but they are not identical.

A firearm assembled from an unfinished receiver is not automatically 3D printed. A gun with a printed frame is not completely made of plastic. A privately made gun is not automatically illegal. In addition, a lawfully made firearm without a serial number differs from a factory gun whose owner removed or damaged the serial number.

Grouping all of those firearms under one label may create a simpler headline. It does not help readers understand the issue.

Reporters create a similar problem when they combine ghost guns and Glock switches. One issue concerns how someone made, marked, or acquired a firearm. The other involves a device that changes how a semiautomatic pistol operates.

Police may recover both during the same investigation. That does not make them the same legal or technical issue.

Ghost Guns Are Not Automatically Illegal

The phrase “ghost gun” often hides an important legal fact. Under federal law, Americans have long had the ability to manufacture firearms for personal use.

According to ATF guidance on privately made firearms, a person who may legally possess a firearm may generally build one for personal use without obtaining a federal manufacturer’s license. Federal law also does not automatically require that person to add a serial number or register the firearm.

However, several limits apply.

The builder cannot be prohibited from possessing firearms. A person also cannot claim personal use while operating an unlicensed firearm manufacturing business. Separate federal rules cover machine guns and firearms regulated by the National Firearms Act.

State and local laws may add more restrictions. Some jurisdictions require serial numbers on privately made guns. Others restrict unfinished frames, receivers, or certain methods of manufacture. Anyone who builds a firearm must follow every law that applies in that location.

Still, the basic federal distinction matters. A missing manufacturer-applied serial number does not automatically make a firearm illegal.

What Is a Privately Made Firearm?

ATF uses the term “privately made firearm,” often shortened to PMF. It generally describes a firearm made by someone other than a licensed manufacturer. A licensed manufacturer also did not apply a serial number when the firearm was made.

ATF acknowledges that not all privately made firearms are illegal. Federal law does not require every firearm to carry a serial number.

Different rules may apply after a privately made gun enters a licensed dealer’s inventory. For example, federal regulations generally require an FFL that accepts an unserialized PMF into inventory to add identifying markings and record the firearm.

These distinctions separate lawful personal manufacture from commercial sales and criminal activity.

A gun lawfully built for personal use is not the same as one produced as part of an illegal sales operation. Nor is it the same as a gun possessed by someone who cannot legally own firearms. It also differs from a factory firearm whose serial number someone deliberately removed.

Using “unserialized” as another word for “illegal” erases lawful conduct while doing little to explain the actual crime.

Glock Switches Are Already Illegal

There should be no confusion about the legal status of machine gun conversion devices commonly called Glock switches.

Federal law classifies the conversion device itself as a machine gun. A person does not need to install it in a pistol before possession can create serious criminal liability in nearly all civilian situations.

A switch also offers little practical value to most lawful gun owners.

Automatic fire from a lightweight pistol is hard to control. It consumes ammunition almost at once and makes deliberate fire much more difficult.

Even if lawful owners could easily access these devices, the novelty would likely wear off quickly. Ammunition costs money, control is poor, and emptying a magazine in about one second offers little practical benefit.

Illegal possession remains a serious matter. Switches are dangerous, illegal, and a valid concern for law enforcement.

However, their criminal use does not prove that Glock pistols or similar designs are defective. Millions upon millions of Glock and Glock-pattern pistols are in American hands. Owners use the overwhelming majority without illegal conversion devices.

A criminal must obtain or make a separate illegal part and then install it. The pistol does not convert itself.

Rate of Fire Needs More Context

News reports often state that a converted pistol can fire 900 or even 1,200 rounds per minute.

Those numbers sound alarming. They also need context.

A rate of 900 rounds per minute equals 15 rounds per second. At that rate, a pistol with a 15-round magazine would run empty in about one second.

At 1,200 rounds per minute, the rate rises to 20 rounds per second. A pistol with a 17-round magazine would run empty in less than one second.

The gun cannot continue firing for the rest of the minute. Before firing again, the shooter must remove the empty magazine, find another loaded magazine, and insert it.

Cyclic rate describes how quickly the action can operate while ammunition remains available. It does not mean a pistol with an ordinary magazine can fire 900 or 1,200 rounds continuously for one minute.

The Actual Danger of Automatic Pistol Fire

This context does not make automatic fire safe.

A converted pistol can fire 10, 15, or 17 rounds in roughly one second. That can cause severe harm, especially when the shooter cannot control the muzzle. A criminal does not need hundreds of rounds to injure or kill someone.

That is the real danger, and reporters can explain it without exaggeration.

Quoting only the theoretical rate makes the pistol sound capable of sustained fire without interruption. The number describes the speed of the mechanism. It does not describe a realistic one-minute volume of fire.

News Coverage Creates an Impression the Data Does Not Support

Law enforcement agencies have recovered a growing number of machine gun conversion devices. That increase is real. Switches have also appeared in documented violent crimes.

However, news coverage often goes further than the available data.

Reports regularly combine seizure totals, isolated shootings, dramatic cyclic-rate figures, and repeated references to Glock pistols. Together, those elements leave readers with the impression that criminals commonly use converted pistols in violent crimes.

The cited statistics rarely establish that.

Recovery totals show how many devices police found. They do not show how many criminals fired those devices during robberies, assaults, murders, or other violent acts. Individual cases prove that criminal use occurs. They do not establish how common that use is nationwide.

This distinction matters. The media does not need to state directly that switches are routinely used in shootings. Repeatedly presenting recoveries and selected crimes without wider context creates that impression.

Switches are illegal and dangerous in the wrong hands. Even so, the public deserves to know what the statistics measure and what they do not.

Ghost Guns and Switches Are Being Used to Blame Glock

The term “Glock switch” has become so common that some readers may assume Glock manufactures or approves the devices.

It does not.

Unrelated third parties produce these illegal aftermarket parts. Some enter the country through illegal imports. Others come from domestic production or additive manufacturing. People associate the devices with Glock because they fit certain Glock-pattern pistols, not because Glock makes them.

Still, constant use of the Glock name has changed the discussion. Attention has moved away from the illegal device and the criminal who possesses it. Instead, lawsuits and proposed laws increasingly focus on Glock’s pistol design.

Some groups argue that Glock should redesign its handguns so criminals cannot install illegal third-party devices.

That creates a troubling standard.

Manufacturers should answer for real defects in their products. They should not automatically carry responsibility for every illegal modification that another person may design, make, sell, or install.

A Glock pistol does not become a machine gun on its own. Someone must obtain a separate conversion device, install it, and knowingly violate federal law.

When a criminal illegally modifies another common product, responsibility usually starts with the criminal. The existence of an illegal modification does not prove that the original product was defective.

Ghost Guns Do Not Define Lawful Gun Owners

Lawful gun owners often face a false choice.

We are expected to dismiss every concern about illegal switches or accept new restrictions on common pistols because criminals modify them.

Neither position makes sense.

A reasonable person can believe that switches are dangerous. Automatic pistol fire is difficult to control, and criminals who use converted guns should face serious consequences.

That same person can expect accurate reporting about how the devices work, what the numbers mean, and when privately made firearms remain lawful.

There is no conflict between opposing illegal conversion devices and opposing efforts to vilify common firearms and their owners.

Accuracy matters most when a report may influence criminal law, public safety policy, or restrictions on lawful ownership.

The Problem Goes Beyond One News Report

This issue does not begin or end with one television station, newspaper, reporter, police department, or advocacy group.

The same claims appear again and again.

Reports describe complete firearms as downloadable. They treat a printed frame as a fully printed gun. They use “unserialized” as another word for illegal. Reports also quote cyclic rates without explaining magazine capacity or reloads. Finally, they present illegal conversion devices as evidence of a defect in millions of lawful pistols.

Once an official statement or major report uses that wording, other outlets repeat it. Repetition can make an incomplete claim sound authoritative.

Correcting those claims does not excuse criminals or promote switches. It also does not deny that criminals sometimes use ghost guns.

Instead, it asks journalists and public officials to discuss firearms with the same care they would use when covering medicine, automobiles, or other technical subjects.

Ghost Guns Require Facts, Not Fear

The public gains nothing when officials and reporters package real concerns with misleading language.

A downloadable file is not a complete firearm. A printed frame still needs many additional parts. A gun without a manufacturer-applied serial number is not automatically illegal. A theoretical cyclic rate is not the same as sustained fire. An illegal conversion device is not a factory Glock product.

Switches can be illegal and dangerous without turning every Glock pistol into a threat.

Ghost guns can create challenges for police. That does not mean reliable firearms simply appear from inexpensive printers.

Lawful gun owners can support the prosecution of criminals who possess illegal conversion devices. At the same time, they can oppose attempts to use those crimes against common firearms and responsible owners.

That position does not defend switches or ignore criminal misuse.

It asks for facts, accuracy, and context.

GLOCK is a registered trademark of GLOCK, Inc. Industry Outsider is not affiliated with or endorsed by GLOCK, Inc. The term “Glock switch” appears here because it is the common name for illegal third-party conversion devices designed for certain Glock-pattern pistols.

I was not immediately sold on the red accents for a pocket knife. Still, those small touches give the Nomad a unique style while gently moving it away from the fully tactical look an all-black knife might suggest.

That balance carries through the rest of the design. The Nomad combines a curved D2 blade with a narrow aluminum handle, fast thumb-stud opening, and a crossbar lock. It looks different from a classic Buck, but it still has the trim profile and practical feel I associate with the brand.

After using the Buck 700 Nomad for a bunch of the usual cutting jobs that come up throughout my day, I found it to be a very capable everyday carry knife at a sensible price.

Buck 700 Nomad Specs

Buck offers the Nomad in Black, Blue, and Bronze. My review knife is the Black version, with a black blade and handle broken up by red accents.

First Impressions of the Buck 700 Nomad

The Nomad arrived sharp and ready to use. In the hand, it feels slim with a nice amount of weight. It is not heavy enough to become a burden, but it is also not so light that it feels cheap.

The aluminum handle gives it a solid feel without adding unnecessary bulk. Even with its nontraditional styling, the Nomad retains the slim profile I have come to expect from Buck.

Handle Shape and Texture

The Nomad has subtle file-style texturing around the edges of the aluminum handle, while most of the grip remains fairly smooth.

That fits the role of the knife. This is an everyday carry folder, not a hard-use outdoor knife designed for cleaning fish in the rain or working with wet, muddy hands at a campsite.

For opening packages, cutting twine, handling lunch, and taking care of the other small jobs that come up during the day, it does not need extremely aggressive texturing. The smooth aluminum is comfortable and unobtrusive.

Even so, I would personally prefer a little more texture across the grip. That is a matter of preference rather than a serious criticism. The handle worked well throughout my review, and the knife never slipped during normal use.

Pocket Carry

The pocket clip works very well, which I have come to expect from Buck. It is also reversible for left- or right-side tip-up carry.

It holds the Nomad securely without making the knife difficult to remove when needed. Once clipped into my pocket, the Nomad stays out of mind until a cutting job comes up.

The black finish also held up well during carry. The flat surfaces of the handle still look good, and the blade finish remains like new after cardboard processing and the other cutting tasks.

The only visible wear is along the sharper inner edges of the aluminum handle near the spine. Those edges picked up a few light marks, probably from rubbing against my keys in the same pocket. It looks like normal carry wear rather than a problem with the finish.

Opening, Closing, and Lockup

Like the Buck 698 Ferrox, the Nomad is remarkably smooth and fast.

Despite having no assisted-opening mechanism, the Nomad opens quickly and smoothly with either thumb stud.

The blade locks up solidly with no lateral movement that I could detect. Pulling down on the crossbar lock allows the blade to drop smoothly back into the handle while keeping your fingers clear of its path.

It has also remained as solid as it was on the day I took it out of the box. Nothing has loosened, developed play, or started rattling during my time with it.

Buck Nomad 700 D2 Blade Performance

The D2 blade was plenty sharp and held up well during normal use.

Recycling day provided one of the better tests. I had a pile of empty boxes to cut up, and the Nomad handled the cardboard processing without trouble.

For more basic jobs, including cutting rope and twine, opening boxes and letters, and using it in a pinch for lunch, the Nomad is more than sharp enough.

When the edge eventually needs a touch-up, a diamond or ceramic sharpener will make the job easier. Based on how it performed during my review, that may not be necessary for quite a while.

Drop-Point Blade Shape

The curved drop-point blade adds useful versatility.

It works well for opening packages and making more precise cuts, but the curve also makes it more useful for food and slicing tasks. If you find yourself using your pocket knife around the kitchen or during lunch, that extra belly makes a noticeable difference. And yes, I am a bit OCD about keeping the blade clean, so I have no issues using it for my food.

The Ferrox has a straighter, more utility-focused reverse tanto blade. The Nomad is the better fit for someone who wants a little more slicing ability without giving up normal EDC performance.

Buck 700 Nomad: An Office-Friendly EDC Knife

One small interaction helped confirm that the Nomad works well in a workplace.

I wore a new T-shirt to work and noticed a long thread hanging from the back. Since I could not easily reach it, I handed the Nomad to a female coworker and asked her to cut it.

She used the knife without hesitation, and the interaction did not draw any negative attention. That told me something useful about the Nomad’s appearance. It looks like a practical pocket knife rather than something designed to intimidate people.

At the same time, it is still a capable knife. I would not want to face someone holding one in a defensive situation. Somehow, the Nomad finds the right balance between being effective and remaining appropriate for normal daily use.

Modern Styling With a Familiar Buck Profile

The black aluminum, red accents, thumb studs, and crossbar lock place the Nomad firmly in Buck’s modern EDC lineup.

What keeps it connected to the brand is its narrow profile. Even with the nontraditional styling, it retains the slim feel I have long associated with Buck knives.

Price, Warranty, and Overall Value

The Nomad hits a sweet spot for everyday carry.

You get D2 steel that holds an edge well without requiring excessive maintenance, smooth action, solid lockup, a good pocket clip, and the overall quality I expect from Buck.

It is also covered by Buck’s Forever Warranty, which adds some reassurance for a knife intended to be carried and used regularly.

For someone wary of spending hundreds of dollars on an EDC knife, or worried about losing an expensive daily carry, the Nomad is a strong option. Spending much less would probably mean giving up a noticeable amount of the materials, action, finish, and overall quality that make it appealing.

Final Thoughts on the Buck 700 Nomad

The Buck 700 Nomad is easy to carry, pleasant to use, and priced where a good EDC knife should be.

I would personally prefer a little more handle texture, but that is the only real change I would make. The Nomad remained solid throughout my review and handled everything I asked of it.

Check the current price at Buck Knives before buying.

As always, I’d like to thank Buck Knives for providing their 700 Nomad for our testing and evaluation. Visit Buck Knives to learn more about the Nomad and check current pricing.

The rifle is based on Henry’s Long Ranger platform, but its configuration reflects the needs of hunters who track deer or move through heavy cover. In those conditions, a shorter and lighter rifle can be easier to carry and quicker to bring on target.

Henry H14 Big Woods Carbine Built for Heavy Timber

The Henry H14 Big Woods Carbine features an 18.5-inch blued steel barrel and an overall length of 39 inches. It weighs less than seven pounds before adding an optic, sling, or ammunition.

Those compact dimensions should make the rifle easier to maneuver through brush and dense wooded terrain. The reduced weight may also appeal to hunters who cover significant distances while tracking deer.

Henry equips the rifle with a factory-installed Skinner peep sight and a bright fiber-optic front sight. This combination is intended to provide quick sight acquisition without the added weight or bulk of a scope.

Hunters who prefer an optic still have that option. The receiver is drilled and tapped for mounting a scope.

Long Ranger Action and Detachable Magazine

The rifle uses the same basic action design found in the Henry Long Ranger. Instead of a traditional lever-action locking system, it uses a geared action and a six-lug rotating bolt.

A detachable four-round magazine allows the rifle to use pointed .308 Winchester ammunition. This gives hunters access to a broad selection of modern hunting loads while retaining the handling and operation of a lever-action rifle.

Henry H14 Big Woods Carbine Specifications

The Big Woods Bucks Connection

Big Woods Bucks is a group of experienced Northeast hunters and trackers focused on traditional whitetail hunting in large, heavily wooded areas. Their approach emphasizes tracking, woodsmanship, and moving through deer habitat.

That background influenced the rifle’s compact dimensions, low weight, and sight configuration. The American walnut buttstock also features an engraved Big Woods Bucks logo with green plaid accents.

“The Long Ranger Big Woods Carbine is the perfect choice for lever-action hunting in the Big Woods,” said Hal Blood, Master Maine Guide, author, and tracker. “The short, light, smooth action topped with a Skinner peep sight is the perfect combination.”

Price and Availability

The Henry H14 Long Ranger Big Woods Carbine is now shipping to authorized Henry dealers. It has a suggested retail price of $1,500.

This article is based on product information and images supplied by Henry Repeating Arms. We have not tested or handled the rifle.

They are also cool glasses. The thin metal frames, large lenses, and familiar shape have looked good for decades. More importantly for firearms enthusiasts, Aviators have real roots in military aviation. They later became associated with police officers, outdoor use, action films, and American culture.

That connection is still visible in the firearms industry. Colion Noir and Garand Thumb are two well-known firearms personalities who have worn Aviator-style sunglasses. Their personal styles are very different, but the glasses look natural on both of them.

There is one practical distinction worth making. Standard Aviator sunglasses should not automatically be treated as shooting glasses. Anyone who wants the same look during live fire should verify the impact rating or choose protective eyewear inspired by the classic design.

Aviator Sunglasses Started With Military Aviation

Aviators were not originally created as a fashion accessory.

Early pilots needed eyewear that reduced glare and provided broad coverage in bright conditions. Traditional flight goggles could be bulky. As a result, pilots needed something lighter and easier to wear.

The resulting design used a thin metal frame and large teardrop-shaped lenses. Those lenses covered more of the area around the eyes. At the same time, the lightweight frame made the glasses more comfortable than older goggles.

According to Ray-Ban’s history, the company developed glare-reducing lenses for U.S. pilots during the 1930s. Ray-Ban identifies 1937 as the introduction of the Aviator Classic.

That history gives Aviator sunglasses an authentic connection to military and outdoor culture. They did not begin as eyewear designed to imitate military equipment. They began as functional equipment.

Why the Aviator Sunglasses Design Still Works

Many historical products no longer look appealing outside a museum. Aviators are different.

The thin frame, double bridge, and teardrop lenses remain easy to recognize. The glasses stand out without looking excessive. They also work with everything from jeans and a T-shirt to a field jacket or button-down shirt.

That flexibility matters in the firearms industry. Not every gun owner wants to dress in tactical clothing or wear accessories that immediately identify them as part of the shooting community.

Aviator sunglasses offer a subtler connection. Their military background is there, but they are also practical everyday sunglasses. They work while driving, traveling, attending industry events, or going about the rest of the day.

Aviator Sunglasses in Firearms Culture

Firearms culture has always drawn from military, law enforcement, aviation, hunting, and outdoor traditions.

That influence appears in boots, field watches, jackets, bags, and eyewear. Aviators fit naturally into that mix because they already have the history to support the connection.

They are not trying to look military-inspired. They are military-inspired.

Colion Noir and Garand Thumb are good modern examples of how the Aviator look fits different parts of firearms media.

Colion Noir is known for combining firearms and Second Amendment commentary with a polished personal style. Aviator-style sunglasses fit naturally into that presentation.

Garand Thumb has a different image. His style is tied more closely to military experience, field equipment, training, and firearms testing. Aviator-style glasses work there as well.

Neither personality created the connection between Aviators and firearms. That connection existed long before either entered the industry. Instead, they show that the design still works across very different parts of modern firearms culture.

Top Gun Helped Keep Aviator Sunglasses Relevant

Hollywood also helped keep Aviators connected to military confidence and aviation.

The most obvious example is Top Gun. Tom Cruise’s Maverick made Aviator sunglasses part of one of the most recognizable military-film images of the 1980s.

The glasses belonged in that setting because they already had a real connection to military pilots. The movie did not create that relationship. It introduced it to a much larger audience.

The influence returned with Top Gun: Maverick. GQ reported that the sequel renewed interest in Aviator sunglasses, echoing the effect of the original film decades earlier.

That kind of staying power is unusual. Aviators remain linked with military aviation, confidence, and people who operate serious equipment. Those same qualities make them feel at home in firearms culture.

Ray-Ban Has Preserved the Aviator Look

Ray-Ban has introduced different versions of the Aviator over the years, but the basic design remains familiar.

The current Ray-Ban Aviator collection includes different lens colors, frame finishes, sizes, and variations. However, the thin metal frame and large lens shape remain at the center of the collection.

Buyers can choose traditional green lenses, darker tints, mirrored lenses, or other variations without losing the overall Aviator identity.

Many companies update classic products until little remains of the original. Ray-Ban has generally avoided that problem. The Aviator has changed enough to stay current without losing the features that made it recognizable.

Aviator Sunglasses Are Not Automatically Shooting Glasses

This is where the topic becomes especially relevant for firearms enthusiasts.

Aviators have military roots and look right at home around firearms. They are also worn by some of the most recognizable people in the industry. However, none of that automatically makes a pair of sunglasses suitable for live fire.

Standard Ray-Ban Aviators are sold as sunglasses. Shooters should not assume they provide ballistic protection unless a specific model is clearly marked as meeting an appropriate impact standard.

This is not criticism of Colion Noir, Garand Thumb, or anyone else seen wearing Aviator-style glasses. A photo or video does not necessarily show what eyewear someone uses during every live-fire session.

The point is simply that appearance and safety ratings are two different things.

When shooting, lens material, frame construction, coverage, and impact rating matter more than style. Ordinary sunglasses may reduce glare and provide UV protection. Those benefits are still not the same as tested impact protection.

Look for Rated Aviator-Style Eye Protection

Shooters who like Aviator sunglasses do not necessarily have to give up the look at the range.

Some protective eyewear uses a similar shape while adding larger lenses, more wraparound coverage, stronger materials, and frames designed to stay secure during active use.

Those glasses may not look exactly like traditional Ray-Bans. That is often the compromise required to provide better protection.

The important step is to verify the actual rating. A pair of glasses can resemble an Aviator without being suitable for shooting. Check the manufacturer’s specifications and confirm that the eyewear meets a recognized impact standard.

Traditional Aviators still make sense for driving, travel, outdoor events, casual wear, and time spent around the firearms industry. Ballistic-rated eye protection makes more sense during live fire.

That may mean switching glasses when arriving at the range. It may also mean finding an Aviator-inspired protective design with a suitable safety rating.

Final Thoughts on Aviator Sunglasses

Aviator sunglasses have earned their place in firearms culture.

They began as practical eyewear for pilots and became one of the most recognizable sunglass designs in the world. Movies such as Top Gun reinforced the military connection. Modern firearms personalities such as Colion Noir and Garand Thumb show that the style still fits naturally within the industry.

And yes, Aviators are simply cool glasses.

They look confident without being loud. They carry military history without appearing like costume equipment. They also work across different styles, which explains why they continue to appear around firearms, aviation, vehicles, and outdoor culture.

Just remember that history and appearance are not safety ratings.

Traditional Aviators are excellent everyday sunglasses. For live fire, shooters should verify the impact rating or look for an Aviator-inspired design made specifically to provide proper eye protection.

That combination makes sense on the KSG. This is not a conventional pump shotgun, and treating it like one misses the point. The KSG loads from the underside into two selectable magazine tubes, and it ejects from the underside as well. That makes it a true ambidextrous shotgun, which is one of the platform’s best practical features.

Our KSG is mostly for range fun, but that does not mean every upgrade has to be cosmetic or pointless. If an accessory makes the gun more functional or more enjoyable to shoot, I am interested. The Mesa Tactical SureShell Carrier and Rail for the Kel-Tec KSG checks those boxes. It adds six shells to each side of the shotgun, giving the KSG another dozen rounds on the gun, and it does it without looking like an afterthought.

It is not the cheapest way to carry extra shells on a KSG. Velcro shell cards are popular for a reason, and there is nothing wrong with them. This is a different kind of upgrade. The Mesa Tactical SureShell is a premium, integrated KSG shell carrier that adds shell storage, replaces the rail, and gives you another place to mount an accessory if needed.

Why Add the Mesa Tactical SureShell to a KSG?

The first question is obvious: Does the KSG really need more capacity? For casual range use, probably not. For defensive use, the KSG already carries more shells than most traditional pump-action shotguns. But this upgrade is not only about raw shell count.

The bigger benefit is organization. The KSG gives you two selectable magazine tubes, which already opens the door to keeping different loads separated. Adding a SureShell carrier to the Kel-Tec KSG gives you another way to stage spare rounds. You might keep slugs in the carrier, buckshot in the tubes, or simply use the extra shells to keep the range session moving.

The KSG also takes practice. It is a bullpup shotgun with underside loading, underside ejection, and a tube selector. Anyone used to a conventional pump shotgun will need time with the platform. Having extra shells attached to the gun does not change that learning curve, but it does keep more ammunition organized and available.

For our use, the KSG is fun first. It is loud, strange, compact, and always gets attention. At the same time, the KSG has been used as a serious defensive shotgun by people who choose to run the platform. The Mesa Tactical SureShell works either way. It makes a range toy more enjoyable, and it makes a defensive KSG more complete.

Mesa Tactical SureShell Carrier and Rail Overview

The Mesa Tactical SureShell Carrier and Rail for the Kel-Tec KSG combines a replacement optics rail with shell carriers on both sides. The version tested here uses aluminum carrier yokes for 12 gauge shells, with six shells on each side.

In total, this KSG shell carrier adds onboard storage for twelve extra 12 gauge shells. That is on top of the twelve 3-inch shells or fourteen 2.75-inch shells held in the dual magazine tubes. It also replaces the factory top rail with an anodized aluminum Picatinny rail. That matters because the KSG is often set up with an optic, and a solid KSG optics rail is not just cosmetic.

Mesa Tactical also includes side mounting points for accessory rail sections. I installed the included rail section so the shotgun will be ready for a light later. A light makes sense on a defensive shotgun, and I like having the option available.

As a Kel-Tec KSG accessory, the Mesa Tactical SureShell fits the shotgun well. The KSG is compact, unconventional, and already built around doing things differently. A clean, integrated shotgun shell carrier and rail system makes more sense here than a pile of separate add-ons.

Installed on the Original Kel-Tec KSG

I tested this setup on my original Kel-Tec KSG variant. This one happens to be the ODG version, which I prefer quite a bit over basic black.

The shotgun came to me used with a Sightmark optic already mounted. Would I choose that optic if I were starting from scratch? Probably not. But this particular optic has survived a surprising amount of abuse. Over the past eight years or so, it has seen countless rounds and has not lost zero, so I have left it on the KSG for now.

After installing the Mesa Tactical SureShell rail, I put the Sightmark back on and gave it a quick zero check. I also added the included accessory rail section in case I decide to mount a flashlight later.

Installing the Mesa Tactical SureShell on the KSG

Mesa Tactical’s instructions say installation takes about five minutes. That seems realistic when everything goes smoothly.

My install took longer because I was taking photos, and because this KSG had one stripped screw that took extra time to remove. Once I handled that, the actual installation went quickly. Without photos and without the stripped screw, five minutes would be a fair expectation. It involves removing the original rail and replacing it with two recoil lugs, then attaching the new rail to the lugs.

During installation, the rail may seem like it will stay loose. Keep going. Once you follow the instructions through to the end and tighten everything down, the assembly locks in solid. I found no wobble, no alignment issue, and no reason for concern. Rather than trying to summarize them, I’m including a link to the installation instructions here.

That matches my general experience with Mesa Tactical parts. They do their homework. Their products install cleanly, fit properly, and feel like premium components. The price reflects that, but so does the quality.

Mesa Tactical SureShell Retention and Onboard Storage

Shell retention matters on any onboard shotshell carrier. A carrier can look great, but it still has to hold shells securely under recoil and release them when needed.

The Mesa Tactical SureShell carriers hold shells snugly. I normally run shells brass up as a little extra insurance. That is my preference because I do not want gravity working against me. Even so, Mesa Tactical’s rubber friction retention system does a solid job keeping shells in place.

Mesa Tactical also gives you options for the rubber retention material. The gripping part can be replaced, and Mesa Tactical offers free replacements for the rubber if it wears out. That is a nice detail. The wear parts work well. You can tune the friction, and Mesa Tactical supports it after purchase.

That kind of retention matters on a KSG shell carrier. The KSG is a compact 12 gauge shotgun, not a soft-shooting plinker. The carrier needs to keep shells secure under the recoil and rough handling that comes with a 12 gauge shotgun.

Accessing Spare Shells on the KSG

Nothing about the KSG feels completely natural at first. That is not a complaint. It is just the reality of a bullpup pump shotgun with dual tubes and a tube selector.

The Mesa Tactical SureShell carriers place the shells farther forward than they would sit on a traditional shotgun. In some ways, that makes them easy to reach. In other ways, this is still a KSG, so reloads and load management require practice.

Having spare rounds attached to the shotgun can still be easier than pulling shells from a pocket, pouch, belt carrier, or bandolier. It also keeps the ammunition with the gun. Whether you use the KSG at the range or as a defensive shotgun, keeping extra shells on the shotgun makes sense.

Mesa Tactical SureShell Weight and Balance

The replacement rail adds a negligible amount of weight. The twelve extra 12 gauge shells add more noticeable weight, but not enough to create a handling problem.

The KSG already feels like a compact little beast. The Mesa Tactical SureShell does not suddenly make it awkward. If anything, the extra weight may help take a little edge off recoil.

My KSG has a stubby vertical grip installed, and the SureShell carrier caused no interference. The carriers sit up and out of the way. Pump movement, hand placement, and normal use all stayed the same.

As a practical upgrade, this Kel-Tec KSG shell carrier changes the shotgun less than you might expect. It adds useful shell storage and a better rail, but it does not ruin the compact feel that makes the KSG interesting in the first place.

Range Use With the Mesa Tactical SureShell

Ammo is not cheap, so this was not a 500-round torture test. Between three shooters, we ran a mix of birdshot, some buckshot, and slugs through the KSG with the Mesa Tactical SureShell Carrier and Rail installed.

The rail stayed solid. The shell carriers did their job. Nothing shifted, rattled, or came loose. Mesa Tactical’s instructions do not call for thread locker, and I did not use any. Nothing loosened during the range session.

The Sightmark optic also continued to hold zero. Again, it may not be the optic I would recommend as the ultimate KSG choice, but this particular one has taken a lot of abuse and keeps working.

The important takeaway is simple: the Mesa Tactical SureShell stayed put, held the shells securely, and did not interfere with running the shotgun.

KSG Range Toy or Defensive Shotgun?

For us, this KSG mostly lives as a range novelty. It’s fun, loud, cool-looking, and always a conversation piece. The Mesa Tactical SureShell Carrier and Rail makes it even more fun because it gives us more shells on board and a better overall setup.

The serious side is easy to see as well. If someone uses a KSG as a defensive shotgun, another dozen rounds on board can matter. Add the upgraded Picatinny rail and the option to mount a light, and the shotgun becomes a more complete package.

Would the KSG be my first choice for defense? No. But if someone commits to the platform, this Mesa Tactical setup makes a lot of sense. It adds capacity, improves organization, and keeps everything attached to the gun in a solid, professional way.

Final Thoughts on the Mesa Tactical SureShell

The Mesa Tactical SureShell Carrier and Rail for the Kel-Tec KSG is not the inexpensive way to add shells to a shotgun. Velcro shell cards are popular for a reason. They are simple, lightweight, easy to replace, and easy to swap. If that is what you want, there is nothing wrong with that approach.

This is different. This is the premium, integrated, amittedily badass option. It replaces the rail, adds six shells on each side, gives you accessory mounting options, and fits the KSG like Mesa Tactical properly engineered it for this shotgun. Because they did.

There really is not much downside besides the price. At the time of publication, Mesa Tactical lists the aluminum version at $289.95 and the polymer version at $229.95. Whether this is a hobby gun or a defensive shotgun, quality comes at a price. Good stuff is not cheap. In this case, the fit, finish, shell retention, and all-in-one design make the price easier to accept.

For KSG owners who already like the platform and want a serious upgrade, the Mesa Tactical SureShell is easy to recommend. It makes a fun shotgun more fun, and it makes a practical shotgun more practical.

As always, I would like to thank Mesa Tactical for sending the SureShell Carrier and Rail for the Kel-Tec KSG for our testing and evaluation. Visit Mesa Tactical to see their full line of shotgun accessories and other quality products.

Fenix sent me the Turquoise version of the E06R for this review, and it arrived in standard retail packaging with the expected accessories. That includes the USB-C charging cable, lanyard, and key ring. While turquoise would not have been my first color choice, I don’t mind it. In fact, the more I used the light, the more I liked the overall package. At that point, the color didn’t matter. It’s actually grown on me a bit.

I chose this one specifically because the size and price point ($55.95 at time of publication) make it a very attractive everyday carry flashlight. It is not too expensive. It is not bulky. The output range is useful. The quality feels high. And for a compact EDC light, it is very easy to recommend.

Check current price and availability: Fenix E06R Rechargeable EDC Flashlight

Fenix E06R Specs

Before getting into the hands-on notes, here are the main Fenix E06R specs and features:

• Maximum output: 700 lumens
• Maximum beam distance: 361 feet / 110 meters
• Maximum runtime: 60 hours
• Lighting modes: 10 total modes
• White light modes: Eco, Low, Medium, High
• Other light sources: UV light and red laser
• Decorative modes: Rainbow, red flash, blue flash, red/blue flash
• Battery: Built-in 750mAh battery
• Charging: USB-C
• Charging time: About 2 hours from depleted to fully charged
• Size: 2.72 inches long, 1.14 inches wide, 0.63 inches thick
• Weight: 1.90 ounces including battery
• Carry options: Belt clip, key ring loop, included key ring, and lanyard
• Other features: Magnetic tail, lockout, battery level indicator, memory function, and overheat protection

First Impression

My first impression was that this is a cool little light. The shape is great, the design is great, and I like the button layout. Turquoise gives it a low-key pop of color compared to basic black, the finish looks good, and the overall design works.

Most of my flashlights have been round. For well over 100 years, flashlights have mostly been round, so that shape is what most of us are used to. Yet it turns out a flat flashlight is really handy. The E06R fits the hand well, feels ergonomic, and carries nicely for a small EDC light.

I do not have anything against round flashlights. If this were a tactical flashlight, round would still be the way to go. For a compact everyday carry light, though, I think I prefer this flat style. It slips into a pocket, clips to a bag, and feels less bulky than a round light with similar capability. The flat body also makes sense for a light with multiple emitters. The white light, UV light, and red laser all fit neatly into the front of the housing without making the light bulky.

Design and Build Quality

The Fenix E06R is not just a flat slab with a light on the end. Fenix added small machining details along the sides, and the side buttons are slightly recessed. Those little cuts add some grip, but they also make the light more interesting to look at. A flashlight may be a tool, but that does not mean it cannot be aesthetically pleasing too.

That reminded me of the Coast Slayer I reviewed a while back. The Slayer has more obvious firearms-inspired styling, with stacked lenses, angled cuts, and a profile that hints at handgun design. The E06R is much more compact and less aggressive, but both lights show how small design choices can make an EDC flashlight more interesting without hurting usability.

The front of the light is squared off. Toward the tail, the cuts are angled slightly. It is a small detail, but it helps the E06R look and feel more like a well-designed EDC tool than a basic keychain light.

I didn’t abuse the light by dropping it or trying to test its durability, but it feels solid. It doesn’t feel cheap or toy-like. For a small light, it has a premium feel, and I have no doubt that it would hold up to more abuse than I am likely to give it during normal everyday carry.

Carrying the Fenix E06R

I carried the E06R a few different ways during testing. For a couple of work trips, I clipped it to my laptop bag. I also carried it loose in my pocket and clipped it to the edge of my pants pocket. Fenix refers to the clip as a belt clip, though I treat it like a pocket clip, as more commonly found on knives. After trying those options, I think I prefer the carry clip for this light, regardless of what it’s called.

The size is the key. I am pretty sure I could find at least a dozen, if not two dozen, flashlights scattered around our house and vehicles. Even so, the E06R stands out as the one I would actually carry every day. It is small enough and handy enough that I can keep it with me without thinking about it.

I am personally not a big fan of putting it on a key ring. Nothing against the light, since the option is there for people who want it. I’ve just never wanted extra bulk on my keychain. For me, the pocket clip is the better carry option.

The pocket clip also gives the E06R another practical use. In a pinch, I would be more likely to clip it to the brim of a hat and use it as a small hands-free light than rely on the magnetic tail. That’s not its main purpose, but it is a handy option if you need both hands free. And it’s exactly the sort of flexibility I appreciate.

Lockout Matters for Pocket Carry

The E06R does have a lockout function, and it matters. I had the light turn on in my pocket before using the lockout feature. That is not really the light’s fault. It is just something to remember if you carry it loose in a pocket or bag.

To lock the E06R, turn the light off, then press and hold the side purple switch and side red switch at the same time for two seconds. The light blinks twice in Eco output to confirm that it is locked. To unlock it, hold the same two switches again for two seconds. The light unlocks and activates in Eco mode.

With the lockout, I wouldn’t worry about carrying the E06R in a pocket, backpack, laptop bag, or purse. Just remember to lock it before tossing it in with other gear.

White Light Performance

Fenix has been making flashlights for a long time, and that shows in the E06R’s white light settings. Eco is useful when you only need a little light without blasting your eyes or affecting your night vision. From there, Low, Medium, and High give you practical steps up in output instead of awkward jumps between too little and too much.

That is what I like about the E06R. The brightness levels feel well chosen. They do not come across as filler modes added just to fatten up a spec sheet. Each level has a purpose, and for everyday use, that matters more to me than chasing the highest lumen number possible. The Intelligent Memory Circuit helps too, since it recalls the last white light level you used.

At 700 lumens, High gives me as much light as I could reasonably need or expect from a compact EDC flashlight. This is not a full-size duty light, and it is not trying to be one. It is a small, easy-to-carry light with a useful output range when you need it.

Eco became my default mode pretty quickly. After bumping my nightstand one night, I heard something hit the floor. The E06R was still on the nightstand, so I grabbed it and used Eco to see what had fallen, without turning on the light and disturbing my wife.

High got used for a different middle-of-the-night problem when the cat brought a bird into the house. I was able to search the living room without turning on all the lights and waking my wife. That is exactly the kind of situation where a small EDC light makes more sense than lighting up the whole house.

UV Light

The E06R includes a UV light, and I see that as a handy household inspection tool. There are fun uses too, like spotting scorpions if you happen to live somewhere they are around. For me, though, the main value is checking things around the house.

For example, even after having our carpets professionally cleaned a couple of times, the UV light still showed where pets had accidents. That does not necessarily mean the carpet is still dirty. UV can show older staining, residue, or something that normal light does not reveal. Still, it shows how useful a small UV light can be when you want to check carpet, upholstery, or other areas around the house.

I wouldn’t treat the E06R as a professional inspection tool. But as a pocket-sized light that already has white light and a red laser, the UV mode is a useful bonus.

Red Laser

The red laser is not something I use much. I’m not giving any presentations at work that require a pointer. Around the house, though, it has still seen some use. We have a cat, and the laser definitely gets used for that. It’s not the main reason I would buy the E06R, but it is another useful feature packed into this very small light.

Decorative Ring Light

The breathing light is the conversation starter no one asked for. It lights up around the neck switch, and you can cycle through rainbow, red flash, blue flash, and red/blue flash.

I do not see myself using it for anything important, but it is fun. On a little EDC light like this, it adds some personality without getting in the way of the flashlight doing flashlight things.

Controls and Learning Curve

Flashlights used to be simple because most of them only needed an on/off switch. Once you start adding more lighting modes and extra features, the controls naturally get a little more complex.

The E06R is one of those lights where it pays to read the manual. The white light, UV light, red laser, decorative ring light, battery check, and lockout all have their own controls. It is not instantly intuitive if you just start clicking buttons. After reading through the instructions and using it for a day, though, it was easy enough to operate.

The white light uses the neck-mounted switch. Press and hold for half a second to turn it on, then single-click to cycle through Eco, Low, Medium, and High. The UV light uses the purple side switch. The red laser uses the red side switch. That separate-button layout helps once you understand it. You can find the instructions on the product page, which is useful. The included manual has some tiny type that may be difficult for some users to read.

Charging, Battery Life, and Battery Indicator of the Fenix E06R

The E06R charges by USB-C, which is exactly what I want from a modern everyday carry light. Fenix lists the normal charging time at about two hours from dead to fully charged.

The charging indicator is simple. It shows red while charging and turns green when the light is fully charged. Only Eco output can be used while charging.

The battery level check is also useful. With the light turned off, a single click checks the current battery level for three seconds:

• Green solid: 100% to 85%
• Green flashing: 85% to 50%
• Red solid: 50% to 25%
• Red flashing: 25% to 1%

In my use, I charged the E06R when I received it and left it on the charger overnight. About two weeks later, I still had not needed to recharge it. That included more use than it would probably get during normal everyday carry, because any new flashlight is going to get played with during the review period.

For my use, I will probably just put it on the charger every other week or so and not worry about battery life.

Exposed USB-C Port

The USB-C charging port is exposed, with no rubber cover to peel back. At first glance, that might seem like a concern. Fenix notes that the USB-C port has waterproof treatment, so the lack of a rubber cover does not bother me for everyday carry.

I actually prefer not having a small rubber cover. Those covers can be annoying to open, and they can get damaged or lost over time. For an everyday carry light, the open USB-C port makes charging simple while still keeping the light protected as designed.

Magnetic Tail and Hands-Free Use

The E06R has a magnetic tail, but I have not found a specific need for it yet. I did test it the way most people probably will at first. It brought out the kid in me, so I walked around the house sticking it to different things just to see what it would and would not attach to.

Even if I have not needed it for a real task yet, I can see the value. If you need both hands free and have a metal surface nearby, the magnetic tail could turn the E06R into a small hands-free work light.

That said, I am probably more likely to use the pocket clip for hands-free light in a pinch. Clipping it to a hat brim as an emergency headlamp seems more likely for my use than sticking it to a metal surface.

Who Is the Fenix E06R For?

The Fenix E06R is for someone who wants a small EDC flashlight that is easy to keep with them. It makes sense as a pocket light, backpack light, laptop bag light, purse light, or compact backup light.

I have not run into many situations where I needed it in the middle of the workday, but that is also part of the point. It is small enough to carry every day, so it is there when you need it. Whether you are checking under a desk, looking inside a bag, walking through a dark parking lot, inspecting something around the house, or just wanting a backup light nearby, the E06R is easy to justify.

If you are looking for a compact flashlight with a good output range, USB-C charging, a flat pocket-friendly shape, and a few extra tools like UV and a red laser, this one is ideal. The color options ensure it’s fashionable too, if that matters to you.

What About the Fenix E06R PRO RG?

Fenix also sent me the E06R PRO RG, which is the larger, more feature-packed option in this flat flashlight lineup. I still wanted to focus this review on the smaller E06R because that is the model that interested me most as a compact everyday carry light.

Since I had both lights on hand, the PRO RG is worth mentioning for anyone trying to decide between the smaller E06R and the larger version.

The standard E06R is the one I would choose for pocket carry, a laptop bag, or anyone who wants a small light that is easy to keep with them every day. The E06R PRO RG makes more sense for someone who likes the same general flat design but wants a larger light with more output, more modes, and more features.

If you want the smallest and easiest version to carry, I would look at the regular E06R first. If you want more output and do not mind the added size, the E06R PRO RG is worth a look.

Compare both models: Fenix E06R | Fenix E06R PRO RG

What I Would Change About the Fenix E06R

I really looked for something to complain about, and I am not coming up with much. Fenix already offers the E06R in several colors, including Turquoise, Gun Grey, Graffiti, and Platinum.

The closest thing I have to a real gripe is the printed manual. Because the E06R has several modes and a few different button combinations, the instructions are worth reading. The included manual gets the job done, but the type is tiny. Some users may find it easier to pull up the operating instructions on the Fenix product page instead. I’m one of them, because my reading glasses are never handy when I need them.

Other than that, I do not have much to criticize. I really dig this little light.

Final Thoughts

The Fenix E06R is easy to recommend because it gets the everyday carry balance right. It is small without feeling useless, bright without being oversized, and feature-packed without becoming too complicated once you read the instructions.

The flat shape may be what sold me on this little guy. For a compact EDC flashlight, it just works. It carries well, feels good in the hand, clips easily to a bag or pocket, and does not feel like another bulky item you have to force yourself to carry.

If you want a small rechargeable EDC flashlight with useful output, USB-C charging, lockout, UV, red laser, and a pocket-friendly design, the Fenix E06R is a strong option. It is the kind of light that is useful because it is actually easy to keep with you.

Check current price and availability: Fenix E06R Rechargeable EDC Flashlight

As always, I’d like to thank Fenix for providing their E06R flashlight for my testing and evaluation.

This Buck 698 Ferrox review is based on regular carry and everyday use – I used it like I would any other knife in my EDC rotation. Because a quick look at the specs shows it ticks a lot of boxes for most users. The Ferrox is a modern EDC folder with a D2 reverse tanto blade, aluminum handle, dual thumb studs, and a crossbar lock. It does not have the classic wood-and-metal Buck look, but it still feels like a Buck where it matters.

After carrying and using the Buck 698 Ferrox through a busy stretch of everyday tasks, including a fair amount of cardboard processing, I think Buck got this one right. The Ferrox is trim, smooth, easy to carry, and useful without losing the character I expect from the brand.

Buck 698 Ferrox Specs

Specs are useful, but they only tell part of the story. The real question is whether the Buck 698 Ferrox works as a practical everyday carry knife.

Buck currently offers the 698 Ferrox in Silver, Bronze, and Black. My review sample is the Bronze version, which pairs the darker blade and hardware with a warm-toned aluminum handle.

First Impressions of the Buck 698 Ferrox

Out of the box, the Ferrox made a good first impression. The factory edge was sharp enough to easily slice small curls off a piece of paper, which is usually a good sign that your blade has a sharp edge. What surprised me was how long it was able to hold that edge.

The design is attractive without being flashy. It’s aesthetically pleasing, but it’s still a tool, first and foremost. It has a modern look, but Buck did not make it overly tactical just for attention. Its proportions are trim, the handle is not too thick, and the knife feels like it was designed to be carried and used.

That matters to me. I have always associated Buck knives with a slim look and feel. Even though the Ferrox is clearly more modern than a traditional Buck lockback, it still has that familiar trim Buck profile.

Opening, Closing, and Lockup

The action on the Buck 698 Ferrox is excellent. It opens smoothly with just the dual thumb studs. There is no assist, yet it feels glassy smooth, like it’s got some fancy bearing system. But it’s just good design and tight tolerances.

Opening and closing the blade is satisfying enough that I found myself using it like a fidget toy for a while. With my fingers clear, the blade drops closed with a light to medium pull on the crossbar lock. The lock tension feels just about right.

Blade lockup is solid, with no movement that I could detect.

The only play I noticed was in the crossbar lock buttons. Even under spring tension, they have the tiniest bit of movement, which is not unexpected for a moving part. If you shake the knife hard enough, you can hear a quiet rattle from the lock buttons. Other than that, the knife operates silently.

More importantly, that slight rattle never mattered during actual carry or use. I only remembered it when I sat down to look back at my early notes. Nothing came loose during the review. The clip stayed tight, the hardware stayed tight, and the knife continued to feel solid.

Part of me initially thought the sliding lock button could use a more aggressive texture. After using it, I think Buck made the right call. There is enough texture to operate it easily, but not so much that it feels sharp or makes accidental unlocking more likely. It unlocks when you want it to, and not before.

Pocket Carry

This may seem like a small detail, but the pocket clip is a big deal to me. A bad clip can ruin an otherwise good everyday carry knife.

I carried the Ferrox in my usual knife spot in my right pocket, and it pretty much disappeared until I needed it. At 3.2 ounces, the weight never really called attention to itself, which is exactly what I want from an EDC folder.

The clip was one of the biggest positives. It was not too tight and not too loose. It held the knife securely, came out when I needed it, and did not fight me every time I reached for it or tucked it back in my pocket. This is exactly how it should be, and other designers would do well to study the design, in my opinion. If you have ever had a bad clip, you know exactly what I’m referring to.

I pay close attention to pocket clips because I have had bad ones before. On a previous knife review, the clip was functional, but poorly designed. It stuck out too far, caught on things, and even scratched my car. Ever since then, I have judged knife clips against that experience.

The Ferrox clip gets it right. It is secure, practical, and unobtrusive. For everyday carry, that matters more than some people realize.

Handle Comfort and Grip

The handle is comfortable and I never gave it a second thought throughout the review. Its lightly textured diamond pattern worked well with dry hands and gave me enough traction for normal use without feeling rough or overly aggressive.

The handle is not too thick, and I did not notice hot spots during repeated use. It didn’t slip during normal cutting tasks either.

If I were using this knife in wet weather or as a dedicated camping knife, I might want a bit more texture. With very wet hands, the grip may not be aggressive enough for everyone. But that is not really what this knife is. The Buck 698 Ferrox is an everyday carry knife first, and for that role, the grip strikes a good balance.

Blade Shape and Cutting Performance

Buck calls the Ferrox blade a reverse tanto, and that description fits. It gives the knife a modern look, but it also works well for the kinds of tasks most people use an everyday carry knife for.

I used it for normal pocket-knife jobs, including opening packages, cutting up cardboard, and general daily tasks. I also cut old rope, paracord, and plastic strapping from shipping boxes. It handled all of that with purpose. This blade understands the assignment.

The blade shape is not perfect for everything. A little more curve toward the end would make it handier for slicing food. I use my pocket knife at lunch fairly often, slicing fruit, veggies, or a piece of chicken. The Ferrox works fine in a pinch, but meal prep is not what this blade shape is optimized for. Perhaps I need a dedicated “lunch box” knife, too.

For cardboard, packaging, rope, and similar EDC tasks, the blade shape makes sense. It is attractive, functional, and gives the Ferrox a distinct look without making it awkward to use.

Edge Retention and Maintenance

The Ferrox came sharp, and it stayed sharp through my review. After a fair amount of cardboard processing, the blade still did not feel like it needed a touch-up. I get a lot of packages delivered, so there is always cardboard to break down and recycle. While I try to stick to utility knives for that, more often than not, I reach for the pocket knife I am already carrying. I would not call this a long-term edge retention test, but for normal carry and review use, the D2 blade held its edge well through plenty of cardboard and other everyday cutting tasks.

When it does need sharpening, D2 may take a little more patience than softer steels. That is part of the tradeoff for better edge retention. A knife like this deserves to be maintained before the edge gets truly dull, so use a quality sharpening setup and stay ahead of it. Put in the effort, and it will continue to be a reliable companion.

I would also keep the blade clean and dry after use. D2 has more corrosion resistance than some tool steels, but it is not fully stainless. For normal EDC use, that should not be a problem, but it is still worth wiping the blade down after cutting food, wet material, or anything sticky.

Does It Still Feel Like a Buck?

Yes, it does.

The Ferrox is clearly not a classic wood-and-metal Buck lockback. It has an aluminum handle, a modern reverse tanto blade, thumb studs, and a crossbar-style lock. On paper, that may not sound like the Buck knives a lot of us grew up around.

In the hand and pocket, though, it still feels like a Buck to me. The proportions are slim. The design is practical. The knife feels like it was built to be used, not just styled to follow a trend.

That is where Buck seems to have found the balance. The Ferrox brings modern EDC features into the lineup without losing the sense that Buck still knows what a pocket knife is supposed to do.

What I Liked

The Buck 698 Ferrox is an attractive knife with a design that works as well as it looks. The blade came sharp, stayed sharp through my use, the thumb studs worked well, and the crossbar lock was convenient without feeling fussy.

The clip was another major positive. It held securely, carried comfortably, and did not snag or scrape the way some poorly designed clips can.

I also like the overall value. This is not an inexpensive “gas-station-bucket” pocket knife, but it also is not priced like Buck’s premium Heritage Elite models. For someone who wants Buck quality but is not drawn to the classic 110 or 112 style, the Ferrox feels like a solid way into the brand.

What I Would Keep in Mind

I don’t really have any complaints about the Ferrox. The only adjustment for me was coming from an automatic knife. With an action this smooth, a manual folder requires you to pay attention and be deliberate when opening and closing it. If you get careless, you can cut yourself. Don’t ask how I know.

The other thing to keep in mind is that this is not the classic Buck look. If you want wood, brass, nickel silver, and a traditional lockback, the Ferrox may not be the knife you are looking for.

The crossbar-style lock also looks and operates differently than a traditional lockback. I had no issue with it at all, but if you specifically want a classic Buck lockback, this may not be for you. Functionally, though, it works very well.

Who Is the Buck 698 Ferrox For?

The Ferrox makes a great everyday carry knife. It’s attractive, reasonably priced, not too heavy, not too light, and easy to carry. It opens smoothly, locks open solidly, and has one of the better pocket clips I have used recently.

It is also not overly intimidating. The design is modern, but it does not come across as excessively tactical. That makes it a reasonable choice for someone who wants an everyday knife that can handle normal use without looking out of place. At the office, no one looks twice if I take it out to open a box or share a sandwich.

It can also handle light weekend camping chores. While it is not my first choice for dedicated food prep, it can slice food, carve wood, cut rope, and handle the kinds of tasks most people actually use a pocket knife for.

If you want one knife to cover a few different everyday tasks, the Ferrox makes sense.

Final Thoughts on the Buck 698 Ferrox

The Buck 698 Ferrox is a modern EDC folder that still feels like a Buck. It is slim, practical, smooth, and easy to carry. The action is satisfying, the lockup is solid, the clip is excellent, and the D2 blade held its edge well through regular use.

It is not the knife for someone who only wants the classic Buck lockback look. But if you want the Buck name, Buck quality, and a more modern everyday carry design at a fair price point, the Ferrox is worth a serious look.

MSRP was $79.99 with a $9 engraving option at the time of publication, but knife prices are always subject to change. Check the current price at Buck Knives before buying.

As always, I’d like to thank Buck Knives for providing the 698 Ferrox for our testing and evaluation. Visit Buck Knives to learn more about the Ferrox and the rest of their extensive knife range.

This is a ready-made first aid kit for home, vehicle, travel, camping, and outdoor use. I would not treat it as a dedicated trauma kit, and I would not make it my primary range medical kit. Instead, I see it as a convenient, well-organized kit for the smaller problems that happen more often than we expect.

After going through the kit, we brought it on a road trip. That is probably the best way to describe where it makes sense. It covers common first aid needs such as cuts, scrapes, minor burns, sprains, and basic wound care. You may pay extra for convenience and organization, but you get peace of mind in return.

This review is based on going through the kit, inspecting the contents, looking at how everything is organized, and deciding where it fits in real use. I did not open or use every sealed first aid item, since many of those supplies are single-use and should stay clean and ready until needed.

Check the current price and availability for the SurviveX Large First Aid Kit on Amazon.

SurviveX Large First Aid Kit Review Summary

The SurviveX Large First Aid Kit is for people who want a practical, pre-built first aid kit without having to buy every item separately. It is larger and more useful than a tiny glove box kit, but still easy enough to keep in a car, closet, camper, or travel bag.

If you already have emergency medical training and know exactly what supplies you want, building your own kit may make more sense. You can choose every item yourself and skip anything you do not need. But not everyone wants to do that. Some people just want a kit that is already assembled, easy to understand, and ready to use.

That is the buyer this kit is for.

What Comes in the SurviveX Large First Aid Kit?

The piece count is a little inconsistent. SurviveX has listed the kit as 250 pieces in some places, while the Amazon listing and pricing currently point to 240 pieces. For this review, I am going with the Amazon listing. Either way, the exact count matters less than the types of supplies included and how well the kit is organized.

The kit includes wound care supplies such as Zip Stitch wound closures, gauze, non-adherent dressings, a pressure bandage, and strip closures. It also includes burn care items, including hydrogel burn gel. For basic CPR support, SurviveX includes a CPR mask with a valve, gloves, and instructions.

The tool and support items include 7-inch trauma shears, an 18-inch conforming splint, and a triangular bandage. For cleaning and hygiene, the kit includes nitrile gloves, BZK antiseptic wipes, alcohol prep pads, and triple antibiotic ointment. It also includes emergency items such as a thermal blanket, glow sticks, and a whistle.

Like most high-piece-count first aid kits, some of the 240-piece total comes from smaller items and duplicates. That is not automatically a bad thing. Duplicates are useful when you are dealing with more than one minor injury, or when you use the kit over time and need extra bandages, wipes, or gauze.

The Zip Stitch wound closure strips are one of the more interesting additions. They make the SurviveX kit feel more complete than cheaper kits that are mostly bandages, wipes, and gauze. They do not turn this into a dedicated trauma kit, but they do give you another option for cuts where a regular adhesive bandage may not be the best fit.

Organization and Ease of Use

The bag itself seems durable enough and pretty well made. I would not treat it like a hard case, but for a soft-sided first aid kit, it feels appropriate for home, vehicle, and travel use. In addition to the top and side handles, it has a belt and buckle, and the entire rear panel is attached via hook and loop fasteners. A shoulder strap is stored inside as well.

The labeled compartments are the bigger advantage. A large first aid kit can become annoying fast if everything is loose or hard to find. SurviveX gives the kit enough structure that you can open it, find the right section, and get what you need without digging through the entire bag.

That matters because a first aid kit is easier to use when everything has a place. If you need a bandage, wrap, burn dressing, or cold pack, you should not have to dig through a pile of loose packets and wrappers to find it. I would still go through the kit myself and learn where everything is before relying on it. Even so, the layout gives you a much better starting point than a cheap, cluttered kit.

First Aid Guide, Fever Strips, and a Missing Flashlight

The kit also includes a first aid guide, which deserves a separate mention. Like any guide, you should read it before you need it. An emergency is the wrong time to figure out where supplies are located or start learning basic first aid steps. At minimum, take a few minutes to review the guide, the kit layout, and the contents before storing it in a vehicle, closet, or travel bag.

SurviveX also includes fever strips for checking temperature. That makes sense for a general home, travel, or family kit.

What I did not find was a small, low-power flashlight or penlight. That feels like an oversight. A simple light can help with checking pupils, looking at a cut or scrape, finding supplies in low light, or dealing with an issue on the side of the road at night. It is an inexpensive addition, but I think it belongs with a kit like this.

Where This Kit Makes Sense

The SurviveX Large First Aid Kit makes the most sense for everyday preparedness. I work on guns, use tools, work in the yard, fix things around the house, and spend plenty of time outdoors. In other words, I find plenty of ways to get a cut, scrape, burn, or minor injury.

For those situations, having a larger first aid kit nearby is useful. It is also a good fit for road trips, camping, family travel, and anyone who spends time outdoors. Most of those situations are not worst-case scenarios. They are the smaller problems that come up at the most inopportune moments.

That convenience is the real appeal of this kit. It gives you more options than a tiny first aid kit, and it saves you from hunting through gas stations, hotel front desks, or convenience stores when someone needs something simple.

Where This Kit Falls Short

No pre-built first aid kit is perfect, and this one is no exception. The biggest limitation is that you should not confuse it with a dedicated trauma kit.

Because many of my readers are shooters, that distinction is worth making. The SurviveX kit may still be useful at the range for minor cuts, scrapes, burns, or other common problems. I just would not make it my only medical kit there. For range use, I would still want a separate shooter’s first aid kit with the right supplies and training for more serious injuries.

That is not a knock against SurviveX. It is simply a different type of kit. This one belongs in the general first aid category.

What I Would Add to the SurviveX Large First Aid Kit

The first thing I would add is a small, low-power flashlight or penlight. It does not need to be expensive, but it belongs with a kit like this. Removing the shoulder strap from its spot inside would make more than enough room for this.

For a home or travel kit, I would add basic over-the-counter medications that match your household. That might include pain relievers, allergy medication, antacids, electrolyte packets, or anything else your family commonly uses. Be sure to store medications properly and check expiration dates.

For a vehicle kit, I would consider extra gloves, an additional emergency blanket, and any items specific to your climate. If you live where it gets very hot or very cold, think about how temperature may affect certain supplies.

For anyone who spends time around firearms, tools, machinery, or remote outdoor areas, I would keep a separate trauma kit. That should include quality components and, more importantly, the training to use them. A tourniquet in a bag is not the same as knowing when and how to apply one.

Final Verdict: Is the SurviveX Large First Aid Kit Worth Buying?

The SurviveX Large First Aid Kit is worth considering if you want a comprehensive, well-organized first aid kit for home, car, travel, camping, or general preparedness. It is not the cheapest way to assemble medical supplies, and it is not a substitute for a dedicated trauma kit. However, it solves a real problem for people who want to prepare better without building a kit from scratch.

For my own use, I see this as a practical home or vehicle kit. It is not the last word in emergency medical preparedness, but it is a much better starting point than the random collection of old bandages and ointment packets a lot of people probably have in a drawer somewhere.

If you already know exactly what you want, build your own kit. If you want a convenient large first aid kit that covers common situations and gives you a solid base to work from, the SurviveX kit makes sense.

Check the current price and availability for the SurviveX Large First Aid Kit on Amazon.

SurviveX Large First Aid Kit FAQs

Is the SurviveX Large First Aid Kit a trauma kit?

No. I would not consider this a dedicated trauma kit. It is better viewed as a large general-purpose first aid kit for common first aid needs. If you want supplies for severe bleeding, gunshot wounds, or penetrating trauma, I would keep a separate trauma kit and get the proper training.

Is this a good first aid kit for the car?

Yes. This is one of the better use cases for it. A car first aid kit should cover common travel problems, minor injuries, and unexpected situations away from home. This kit is larger than a basic glove box kit, but that extra size gives you more options. You will most likely need to store it in the trunk or rear cargo area.

Is this kit good for home use?

Yes. For home use, this kit makes sense for cuts, scrapes, minor burns, basic wound care, and everyday injuries around the house, yard, garage, or kitchen.

Is this a good first aid kit for camping or outdoor use?

Yes. This kit makes sense for camping, road trips, and general outdoor use. It gives you more supplies than a tiny travel kit without forcing you to build a full custom kit from scratch.

Should I build my own first aid kit instead?

If you have training and know exactly what supplies you want, building your own kit may be better. If you want convenience and broad coverage without chasing down every item individually, a pre-built kit like this is a good starting point.

Does the SurviveX Large First Aid Kit include aspirin or other oral medication?

No, it does not include aspirin, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, allergy medicine, or other oral medications. The kit does include triple antibiotic ointment, but I would add any basic medications your household commonly uses.

What should I add to this kit?

That depends on your needs. For home use, consider medications and personal medical items. If you’re keeping it in your vehicle, consider extra gloves, a small flashlight or penlight, and climate-specific supplies. For range or trauma use, keep a separate trauma kit with proper supplies and training.

As always, I’d like to thank SurviveX for providing their Large First Aid Kit for this article.

I tested the PTX35R on two very different pistols: a custom Browning Buck Mark with an aftermarket rail mount and a CZ P10 F full-size 9mm. That gave me a useful mix of rimfire and centerfire use, along with a chance to see how the light mounted on both an aftermarket rail setup and a factory pistol rail.

This was not a high-round-count torture test, and I am not going to pretend otherwise. I fired both pistols with the PTX35R mounted during a few range outings, then spent additional time using the light around the house and yard to evaluate the beam, switches, and general handling.

COAST PTX35R Specs

Mounting the COAST PTX35R Pistol Light

The PTX35R uses COAST’s Tru-Fit mounting system, which is designed to work with Picatinny and universal-style pistol rails. In use, the mounting system was one of the easiest parts of the review. It attached securely to the CZ’s factory rail and also fit the Browning Buck Mark’s aftermarket rail mount without any drama.

I did not need to fight with the fit, chase down alternate keys, or make the light work through trial and error. Once snugged down, it stayed put. During live fire, I did not notice the light shifting, loosening, flickering, or shutting off.

The mounting screw uses a slotted head, which is practical. It is simple, field-friendly, and does not require a tiny proprietary tool that gets lost the first time you actually need it. Not everyone carries a coin these days, so Coast includes its own coin with it.

How the PTX35R Felt on the Pistols

Any weapon-mounted light adds weight to the muzzle end of a pistol. The PTX35R is no exception. At 4.56 ounces, it is not weightless, and you can feel it once it is mounted.

That said, the extra weight did not upset the balance of either test pistol. Both the CZ and the custom Browning Buck Mark are full-size pistols, and the PTX35R felt appropriate on both. In fact, the added muzzle-end weight helped keep the muzzle steady for follow-up shots.

That was more noticeable than expected. The light adds mass where you can feel it, but not in a way that makes the pistols awkward. For range use, home use, or a nightstand setup, that weight may even be a small advantage.

Controls and Switch Feel

The PTX35R has ambidextrous rear switches that can be reached with either the trigger finger or the support hand. On both pistols, the controls were easy to reach from a normal firing grip. I did not need to significantly shift my hand to activate the light.

The switches are easy to activate, which is exactly what I want on a pistol light. They do have a little bit of wiggle. At first, that was a concern. Loose-feeling controls can sometimes suggest a lack of durability or a part that may not hold up. In actual use, that initial concern went away. The slight movement made it clear that I was touching the switch and not the light body itself. Once I spent some time with it, the switch feel became a non-issue.

I used both momentary and constant-on modes while testing the PTX35R around the house and yard. During live fire, I left the light on to make sure recoil did not cause it to shut off or act up. It stayed on as expected.

COAST PTX35R Review: Beam Performance Indoors

The beam is where the PTX35R starts to separate itself from more conventional pistol lights. Many pistol lights give you one beam pattern. The PTX35R gives you an adjustable spot-to-flood beam using COAST’s Snap Focus system. (I gave up trying to get photos in my own house and used the Coast official images.)

Indoors, I preferred the flood setting most of the time. It does a good job of lighting up a wide area, which is useful inside a room or down a hallway. The beam spreads enough light around the space that you can see what is around the target area, not just what is directly in the center of the beam.

The spot beam was also useful. Even when focused tighter, it still offered enough spill that nothing seemed to disappear around the hotspot. That matters because an overly tight beam can create a bright center with too little usable light around it. The PTX35R avoids that problem well enough that both ends of the adjustment range feel practical.

Outdoor Beam Performance

Outdoors, the PTX35R has more reach than I would realistically need for handgun use at night. The listed beam distance is 853 feet, and while I did not treat this like a laboratory measurement, the throw was more than sufficient for practical property use.

The spot beam sends enough light to identify a target past what I would consider a safe distance for handgun shooting at night. That is the more important point. For a pistol light, usable identification distance matters more than chasing the biggest number on the box.

For my use, the flood setting is still where I would leave it most of the time. However, I like having the spot option available. If you need more reach across a yard, toward an outbuilding, or for pest control around a property, the tighter beam gives the PTX35R more flexibility than a fixed flood-style pistol light.

Adjustable Spot-to-Flood Beam in Real Use

The adjustable beam is a real feature, not just a gimmick. That said, I would not assume every user can instantly take full advantage of it under stress.

If the COAST PTX35R is going on a defensive pistol, changing from spot to flood should be part of your training. It would require practice and muscle memory to use the focus adjustment confidently under duress. For defense, training is recommended.

For less urgent use, such as pest control or checking something on your property at night, the learning curve is less critical. You can set the beam where you want it before you need it, or adjust it more deliberately as conditions change.

My only real criticism of the focus system is the texture on the lens housing. More aggressive texture would make it easier to change from spot to flood, while reducing the chance of your hand drifting in front of the muzzle during adjustment. If I could pinch it with just my fingertips, it would be perfect.

A Note About Weapon-Mounted Lights

A weapon-mounted light is not always the right answer for every situation. Since the light is mounted to the pistol, wherever the light points, the muzzle points as well. Searching with a pistol-mounted light can mean pointing a loaded firearm at things you may not actually want to cover with the muzzle.

That is not a PTX35R-specific problem. It applies to weapon-mounted lights in general.

Some users rely on spill, edge lighting, or bouncing light off floors or ceilings to help illuminate a room without putting the hotspot directly on everything they are trying to identify. In the real world, those techniques are not always practical. The layout of the room, the distance involved, and the urgency of the situation all matter.

Because of that, choosing between a weapon-mounted light and a handheld light is a personal decision based on preferences, training, and circumstances. There are good reasons to use either, and some people will want both. If you prefer to keep a separate handheld light available, something like the COAST XP20R flashlight makes more sense than using a weapon-mounted light for every situation.

USB-C Rechargeable Battery and CR123 Backup

The PTX35R uses a COAST ZX310 rechargeable battery, and it can also run on one CR123 battery. That combination is one of the reasons I like the design, especially for anyone looking for a USB-C rechargeable pistol light with a common backup battery option.

I prefer rechargeable batteries whenever possible. At the same time, I keep high-quality CR123 batteries on hand as backups. That gives the PTX35R a practical balance: rechargeable convenience for regular use, with a common backup battery option if needed.

Charging is simple. Unscrew the lens assembly, remove the battery, and plug a USB-C cable directly into the battery. There is no proprietary magnetic charger, no charging cradle, and no special cable to keep track of.

That is a big positive. I do not care for proprietary chargers, especially when they vary from one product to another within the same brand. We are at a point where rechargeable batteries with USB-C ports should be the norm, and the PTX35R gets that right.

How the COAST PTX35R Compares to Other Pistol Lights

I have used pistol lights from several other brands, including Streamlight, Viridian, and Olight. Each has strengths and weaknesses, so I don’t see much value in pretending this is a simple winner-takes-all comparison.

My Streamlight has been reliable for more than 18 years, which is hard to argue against. Viridian offers a different control layout and feature set, including charging designs that do not directly compare to the PTX35R. Olight makes popular lights, but I don’t care for their proprietary charging systems, especially when those chargers can vary across their own product line.

The COAST PTX35R stands out because it combines good output, an adjustable beam, USB-C battery charging, CR123 backup compatibility, easy mounting, and COAST’s reputation for value. I have trusted COAST products for over a decade, and that history gives me confidence in the PTX35R as well.

It is not trying to be a clone of every other pistol light. That is part of the appeal. Someone who only buys the most common duty lights may still lean toward the usual names. But someone willing to look slightly outside the usual brands should find a lot to like here.

Where the PTX35R Makes the Most Sense

The COAST PTX35R makes the most sense for someone who wants a rechargeable pistol light with strong value, a non-proprietary charging approach, a backup battery option, and the flexibility of an adjustable spot-to-flood beam.

For me, the best uses include a nightstand pistol, home or property use, and pest control around a yard or outbuilding. That is why it was also tested on a suppressed rimfire pistol. Not every pistol light needs to live on a defensive centerfire handgun. Some are used for “fox in the henhouse” types of situations.

The PTX35R also makes sense for someone who already trusts COAST products or wants an alternative to the more common pistol light brands. At $129.99, there does not seem to be a big premium added for the adjustable beam. That makes the spot-to-flood feature feel like a useful bonus rather than an expensive novelty.

Where It May Not Be the Best Choice

The biggest practical drawback may be holster compatibility. If you want a weapon-mounted light for a pistol that will live in a dedicated holster, finding the right holster could be a challenge. That is not unusual with less common lights, but it matters.

If holster support is your top priority, a more common Streamlight or SureFire model may be easier to work with. That is simply the reality of the pistol light market.

The other minor drawback is the focus adjustment feel. The Snap Focus system works, and I like having the option. I would just prefer more grip on the lens housing.

Final Thoughts on the COAST PTX35R Rechargeable Pistol Light

After testing the PTX35R on both my Buck Mark and a CZ, I came away impressed with the overall package. It mounted easily, stayed secure during live fire, offered useful controls, and provided a beam pattern that was more flexible than a standard fixed-beam pistol light.

The flood beam is my preferred setting for most indoor use. The spot beam adds reach outdoors, and the transition between the two gives the COAST PTX35R a level of adaptability that many pistol lights do not offer.

I also appreciate the battery setup. A USB-C rechargeable battery with CR123 backup compatibility is the right kind of practical. There is no proprietary charger to lose, and no special cable that only works with one light.

The COAST PTX35R is not perfect. My concerns are minor, and not dealbreakers, though.

For someone looking for a rechargeable pistol light with good output, secure mounting, an adjustable beam, useful battery options, and strong value outside the usual brands, the COAST PTX35R is a very viable choice. Find the COAST PTX35R on the Coast Portland website. Note that they also offer a lower-priced fixed lens model with the same output, or double the power and the same two-beam lens.

As always, I’d like to thank Coast for providing their excellent products for my testing and evaluation.

After running a few boxes through my 6.5 and a few hundred rounds through the B-14R, the Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger proved to be one of the most adjustable and controllable trigger upgrades I have used on a Remington 700 footprint rifle. It can be set extremely light, but real-world use showed that where you should run it matters more than how low it can go.

What Is the Timney Calvin Elite Two Stage Trigger?

The Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger is a drop-in trigger designed for Remington 700 pattern (clone) rifles. This includes factory rifles like the Bergara B-14 and B-14R, as well as many custom actions.

The model reviewed here is the Timney M700 CE Pro trigger, part of the Calvin Elite line. Shooters often refer to it as the Timney CE Pro or simply the Calvin Elite two stage.

It is designed for shooters who want a light, adjustable trigger with a defined two stage pull for better control in precision shooting.

Key Features

• Two stage trigger design that allows the shooter to prep the trigger before the shot
• Wide pull weight adjustment, including extremely light settings
• Highly adjustable trigger shoe for improved finger placement
• Rem 700 compatibility, including Bergara and other clones
• Drop-in installation using factory pins

Trigger Shoe Adjustability and Ergonomics

This isn’t just about pull weight. The trigger itself is highly adjustable, and that is a big part of what makes it stand out. The vertical and horizontal posts allow for slight changes in trigger reach, height adjustment, and even cast. That makes it possible to fine-tune exactly where your finger contacts the trigger shoe, instead of forcing your hand to adapt to a fixed position.

Timney also offers multiple trigger shoe options, including flat, curved, hook, and even a knurled post. As far as I am aware, it is the most ergonomic trigger available. A nice touch is the wrench they include for swaps and adjustments too.

Installation on a Remington 700 Style Rifle

Installing the Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger is straightforward on a Remington 700 pattern rifle.

On both the Bergara B-14R and a 6.5 Creedmoor rifle, the process took only a few minutes.

• Remove the action from the stock or chassis
• Push the pins out in the correct direction
• Swap the trigger
• Reinstall pins

I didn’t need to do any fitting. It dropped cleanly into both rifles.

I installed the 6.5 Creedmoor rifle in my Magpul Pro 700 folding chassis, and I moved the B-14R to my Bergara BMP chassis, both without interference or clearance issues.

Adjusting the Stages and Overtravel

Once installed, the Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger provides separate adjustments for the first stage, second stage, and overtravel.

For the M700 CE Pro, Timney lists a .050 Allen wrench for first stage adjustment and a 5/64 Allen wrench for second stage adjustment. Turning the pull weight screws in increases pull weight, while turning them out decreases pull weight.

The trigger offers a very wide adjustment range overall, with a total pull weight range of roughly 6 ounces to 1.5 pounds.

• First stage: factory set at 2 ounces, adjustable from 1 to 3 ounces
• Second stage: factory set at 8 ounces, adjustable from 4 ounces to roughly 1.25 pounds

Because the stages adjust independently, you can tune not only the total pull weight, but also how the trigger feels leading into the break.

That adjustment range is part of what makes this trigger so useful, but it also means you need to be careful. Timney specifically warns not to take pull weight too low, since the trigger needs enough spring pressure to return to neutral. If it does not return properly, it may bump fire, slam fire, or accidentally discharge.

Overtravel is also adjustable. Turning the overtravel screw in reduces follow-through, while turning it out increases follow-through. If you turn it in too far, the trigger will not fire.

Timney pre-sets the sear engagement screw, and it should not be adjusted below that setting.

In practical terms, I treated the adjustments as something to sneak up on slowly. Make small changes, test the feel, and then perform safety checks before calling it done. While I did this at home, it wouldn’t be difficult to pop the barreled action out of a stock or chassis and fine-tune it at the range. But our weather had been unpredictable (or predictably bad), giving me plenty of free time to tinker.

Real World Performance

For testing, I ran several boxes of various types of ammo through my 6.5 Creedmoor, followed by a few hundred rounds through the Bergara B-14R. Using the rimfire rifle made it easier to isolate trigger feel without recoil masking the break. That’s not usually an issue, but when the break is measured in ounces, this let me concentrate on the trigger while not worrying as much about the $1.30 6.5 round I was sending downrange.

The first stage is extremely light, to the point that it is almost unnoticeable. It transitions cleanly into a very defined wall. The second stage break is controlled and clean. It is not quite a glass-rod snap, but it breaks in a very predictable way that makes it easy to manage during precision shooting.

Consistency was excellent throughout testing. Once set, the trigger maintained the same feel with no noticeable changes over time. Definitely one of the better trigger upgrades I’ve used on a Remington 700.

How Light Is Too Light on the Timney Calvin Elite Two Stage Trigger?

The Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger can be adjusted extremely light. In testing, I brought the second stage down to roughly 4 ounces. At that level, however, the pull weight is barely perceptible. While technically usable, it lacked the level of control and confidence I want in a centerfire rifle. On the .22 LR Bergara B-14R, the trigger also failed a bump test at the lowest setting, which reinforces the need to balance weight with safety.

After testing, a more realistic usable range was around 8 to 10 ounces.

• ~8 oz felt ideal for rimfire use
• ~10 oz would be more appropriate for centerfire rifles

Even on a 15 pound 6.5 Creedmoor with a suppressor, the lightest setting felt too light for a deliberate break. A slightly heavier setting provided better control and confidence. This highlights an important point. The lowest possible setting is not always the best setting for real shooting. Yet, personal preference counts too. In the end, the trigger stayed in my 6.5 Creedmoor at roughly 10 ounces with the knurled post trigger shoe installed. That combination ended up giving me the best balance of control, comfort, and confidence.

Does the Calvin Elite Two Stage Trigger Improve Accuracy?

The biggest benefit is not raw mechanical accuracy, but improved shot control. The defined wall and controlled break make it easier to break shots without disturbing the rifle, especially in precision shooting scenarios. That’s exactly what I was after, and being able to set the exact weight I wanted gave me more confidence in my shots. I’m still working on my long-range skills.

Is the Timney CE Pro Trigger Reliable?

At practical pull weights in the 8 to 10 ounce range, the trigger was consistent and predictable with no reliability issues observed. As with any adjustable trigger, perform proper safety checks after making adjustments.

Pros and Cons

Pros

• Very clean and controlled two stage break
• Extremely wide adjustment range
• Excellent ergonomics with an adjustable shoe
• Drop-in installation with no fitting required
• Consistent performance over several hundred rounds

Cons

• Premium price compared to some alternatives
• Can be adjusted too light for practical use if not careful
• More adjustability than some shooters need

Who This Product Is For

The Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger is best suited for shooters who want more control than a single stage trigger offers.

• Precision rifle shooters
• PRS and NRL competitors
• Rimfire trainer rifle users
• Shooters upgrading a Remington 700 footprint rifle

It is a strong choice for shooters who prefer a defined wall and deliberate break over an ultra-light single stage feel.

Common Concerns About the Calvin Elite Two Stage Trigger

Is it safe at very light weights?

At extremely low settings, the trigger may not pass standard safety checks like bump testing. Some shooters may be better served running it slightly heavier.

Does it fit Remington 700 clones?

Yes. It dropped directly into both the Bergara B-14R and a centerfire Bergara (BMP) with no issues.

Is it too light for hunting?

At lower settings, it may be too light for field use. Heavier adjustments would be more appropriate.

Timney Calvin Elite Two Stage vs Single Stage

Compared to the single stage Calvin Elite, the two stage version offers more control and predictability, and it can be adjusted lighter. The single stage only goes down to about 8 ounces, while the two stage can be brought down to roughly 4 ounces on the second stage. Even so, the two stage provides an improved margin of safety and control that some shooters prefer for precision work.

For shooters focused on control and predictability, rather than simply chasing the lightest possible pull, the two stage may be the better option.

Where to Buy

The Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger is available from several retailers.

Check current pricing at MidwayUSA here.

Final Thoughts

The Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger is a highly adjustable and well-designed upgrade for Remington 700 rifles. It can be set extremely light, but real-world use shows that it performs best when tuned to a practical range that balances control and safety. For shooters who want a clean break with a defined wall and better shot control, this trigger is a strong option.

FAQ

Is the Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger good for precision rifles?

Yes. The defined wall and controlled break make it well-suited for precision shooting applications.

How light can the Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger be set?

It can be adjusted extremely light, around 4 ounces for the second stage, but some shooters may find 8 to 10 ounces more practical for real use.

Does the Timney CE Pro trigger fit Bergara B-14R rifles?

Yes. It fits Bergara B-14 and B-14R rifles with no modification.

Is the Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger easy to install?

Yes. Installation typically involves removing two pins and swapping the trigger with basic tools.

Can you adjust the trigger shoe on the Timney Calvin Elite two stage trigger?

Yes. The trigger shoe can be adjusted for slight changes in reach, height, and cast, and Timney offers multiple shoe options, including flat, curved, hook, and knurled post styles.

As always, I’d like to thank Timney for sending over their excellent Calvin Elite two stage trigger for my testing and evaluation. Check out all their great triggers on the Timney website.

The point was to enjoy shooting with irons.

That is why I added the Tech Sights TSM200CZ adjustable aperture sight set to my CZ 457 Lux. This was not about squeezing the smallest possible groups from a bench or turning the rifle into a precision trainer. It was about making a very traditional rimfire more enjoyable to shoot the way it was meant to be shot. The factory sights work, but the Tech Sights aperture setup gives the rifle a cleaner sight picture, a much longer sight radius, and a more natural aiming process. That, and my vision is bad enough that an aperture sight setup makes a huge difference.

There is one important catch. Installing these sights on a CZ 457 may require a small bolt handle modification, depending on where you mount the rear sight. That is one reason this article exists. I’m sharing the installation, location options, clearance issue, modification, and overall result so you can decide whether this upgrade makes sense for your rifle.

Why Keep the CZ 457 Lux on Iron Sights?

A scoped CZ 457 is a very practical thing. The platform is accurate, the trigger is great, and there are plenty of rail options for optics. If your goal is small groups from the bench, a scope makes perfect sense. I have other rifles set up that way, and there is nothing wrong with that approach.

But the Lux is different.

With its 24.8″ barrel, hogback-style stock, and traditional iron sights, the CZ 457 Lux feels like a rifle that should be shot without glass. It is not trying to be a compact suppressor host, a lightweight field rifle, or a chassis-mounted precision setup. It feels more like an old-school rimfire trainer, only with the benefits of CZ’s modern 457 action.

That makes iron sights part of the experience, not a limitation. Shooting irons forces you to slow down a little. You pay more attention to your sight picture, trigger press, and follow-through. When you hit a small target with irons, it feels earned in a way that is different from using magnification.

That was the whole point of this project. I did not want to make the Lux more modern. I wanted to make the iron sight experience better.

What Tech Sights Change on the CZ 457 Lux

The factory sights on the CZ 457 Lux are usable, and they fit the style of the rifle. But traditional open sights are not always easy on older eyes. You are trying to align the rear notch, the front blade, and the target, all while your eyes can only focus clearly on one plane at a time.

An aperture sight changes that process. Instead of trying to perfectly center a front sight in a rear notch, you look through the rear aperture and focus on the front post. Your eye naturally wants to center the post in the circle. That makes the sight picture faster, cleaner, and easier to use.

It is still an iron sight. There is no magnification, no battery, no glass, and no shortcut around the fundamentals. But for me, aperture sights make irons more enjoyable. They keep the challenge while removing some of the frustration. On a rifle like the CZ 457 Lux, that is a very good tradeoff.

The Tech Sights CZ Aperture Sight Set

The sight set used here is the Tech Sights TSM200CZ adjustable aperture sight set for CZ 455 rifles, including the Lux, FS, Scout, Training Rifle, and Ultra Lux models. While it was originally designed for the CZ 455, it can also be used on the CZ 457, with one important difference. The bolt handle clearance issue covered below applies to the CZ 457, not the older CZ 455 design.

The rear sight mounts to the receiver dovetail and provides the adjustable aperture. The front sight replaces the factory front sight and uses the existing mounting location and screw. Together, they give the CZ 457 Lux a more familiar aperture-style sight picture while keeping the rifle simple and optic-free.

That last part is important. This is not an attempt to modernize the Lux or turn it into a different rifle. The Tech Sights set keeps the rifle in the iron-sight lane. It just makes that lane a lot more enjoyable.

The Sight Radius Improvement Is the Big Payoff

The aperture sight itself is only part of the benefit. The bigger improvement comes from moving the rear sight back to the receiver. That creates a much longer sight radius than the factory barrel-mounted rear sight.

Sight radius matters with iron sights. The longer the distance between the front and rear sights, the less likely small alignment errors are to affect your point of impact. That does not magically make the rifle more accurate, but it does make it easier for the shooter to aim more precisely.

With the Tech Sights rear aperture mounted toward the rear of the receiver, the CZ 457 Lux gets a sight picture that feels much more forgiving. The front post is easier to center, and the rifle feels less fussy when aiming at small targets.

That is especially noticeable on a rifle like the Lux. The long barrel already gives you the potential for a generous sight radius. Moving the rear sight back lets you take better advantage of that. At the rear-most location, the sight radius increases nearly eight inches, to a bit under 29 inches.

Installing Tech Sights on the CZ 457 Lux

Before doing any work, make sure the rifle is unloaded. Remove the magazine, open the bolt, check the chamber. Then check it again. Rimfire rifles are easy to handle casually, and that is exactly why it pays to slow down before working on one.

The front sight portion of the installation is straightforward. The Tech Sights front sight replaces the factory front sight and uses the existing mounting location and screw. You’ll need to slide the hood off and remove the front blade to expose the mounting screw. Then simply use that screw with a bit of threadlocker to install the new sight. Take your time. The CZ 457 Lux is a nice rifle, so this is not a job for impatience.

The rear sight is where things get more interesting. The Tech Sights rear aperture mounts to the receiver dovetail. On the CZ 457, you have three choices. You can mount the sight farther forward to avoid bolt handle interference completely. Or you can mount it mid-way, which still requires some clearance. Best performance comes from mounting it farther back to maximize sight radius, then dealing with the clearance issue. This clearance issue is specific to the CZ 457, not the older CZ 455.

I chose the third option. Twice. Because I have also mounted these sights on my CZ 457 Scout.

For me, the point of this upgrade was to get the rear sight as far back as practical. Giving up that extra sight radius would have defeated part of the purpose. That meant I needed to address the bolt handle clearance.

The CZ 457 Bolt Handle Clearance Issue

On the CZ 457, the bolt handle may contact the windage adjustment knob when the rear Tech Sight is mounted farther back on the receiver. This is a CZ 457-specific issue. The older CZ 455 has a different bolt handle design and should not require the same clearance modification. If you mount the sight farther forward on a CZ 457, you may avoid that contact. However, you also give up some of the sight radius advantage.

I wanted the full benefit, so I made a small clearance notch in the bolt handle.

This is not a difficult modification, but it is not something to rush. I used a semi-round file and removed a little material at a time. After a few strokes, I checked the fit. Then I repeated the process until the bolt handle cleared the adjustment knob.

The goal was not to reshape the bolt handle or remove more material than necessary. I only wanted enough clearance for the sight to function properly. Working slowly made that possible. There is plenty of material left to ensure long-term durability.

Anyone who is uncomfortable modifying a bolt handle should have a qualified gunsmith handle this part. The actual work is simple, but the rifle is too nice to treat carelessly. If you do it yourself, go slow, check your progress often, and stop as soon as you have the clearance you need.

Why I Chose the Rearward Mounting Position

There is a practical argument for mounting the rear sight farther forward. It avoids the bolt handle modification and makes the installation simpler. For some shooters, that may be the better choice.

But I did not add Tech Sights to my CZ 457 Lux just to make a small change. I wanted the best iron sight setup I could reasonably get on this rifle. That meant using as much sight radius as possible.

With the rear aperture mounted farther back, the sight picture is cleaner, and the longer radius makes the front sight easier to use precisely. Since sight radius is one of the biggest advantages of this upgrade, I did not want to leave that benefit on the table.

The small bolt handle notch was worth it for me.

Zeroing the CZ 457 Lux with Tech Sights

Once the sights were installed, zeroing was straightforward. I started close enough to confirm that the rifle was on paper, then made small adjustments until the point of impact matched my point of aim.

The rear sight can be used to adjust both windage and elevation, while the front sight, similar to an AR post, handles elevation. As with most front sight adjustments, moving the front sight up lowers the point of impact, and moving it down raises the point of impact.

For this rifle, I am not chasing a specialized zero. This is an iron-sight rimfire meant for enjoyable shooting at practical distances. A 25 to 50 yard zero makes sense for the way I use it. That keeps the rifle useful for casual targets, small reactive targets, and general rimfire practice.

Different ammunition may shift the point of impact, so it is worth confirming zero with the ammo you actually plan to shoot. That is true with any rimfire, and it is especially noticeable when using irons on small targets. I shoot a lot of CCI SV and Norma Tac-22 through my CZs, and the point of impact is similar enough that it’s not an issue.

Shooting the CZ 457 Lux with Aperture Sights

The first range trip confirmed the reason for doing this project. The CZ 457 Lux with Tech Sights is simply more enjoyable to shoot with irons. Because I can see the front sight.

The rifle still feels traditional. It still has the same balance, the same classic lines, and the same simple rimfire appeal. But the sight picture is much better. Instead of working to align a rear notch and front blade, I look through the aperture, pick up the front post, and press the trigger.

It feels natural.

That is the best part of aperture sights. They do not remove the challenge of shooting irons, but they make the process feel more intuitive. Your eye does much of the centering for you, so you can focus more on the front sight and the trigger press.

At typical rimfire distances, the setup is just fun. Clay fragments, shotgun hulls, small steel, empty cans, and other safe reactive targets are all fair game. The rifle is not trying to be a benchrest gun in this configuration. It is a classic .22 that rewards good fundamentals.

That makes it satisfying in a completely different way than shooting with a scope.

Tech Sights vs a Scope on the CZ 457 Lux

A scope will always have advantages. It gives you magnification, a clearer view of small targets, and a better setup for shooting groups. If I wanted to test ammunition, stretch the rifle farther, or get the smallest groups possible, I would use an optic.

But that is not what this rifle is about for me.

The CZ 457 Lux is enjoyable because it feels simple and traditional. Adding a scope would make it more capable in one sense, but it would also change the personality of the rifle. It would add weight, change the balance, and move the experience away from iron-sight shooting.

Tech Sights go the other direction. They improve the rifle while preserving what makes it enjoyable. The Lux still feels like a classic rimfire. It just has a better sighting system.

That makes this upgrade a good fit for shooters who bought the Lux because they like traditional rifles. If you appreciate walnut stocks, long barrels, iron sights, and the satisfaction of hitting small targets without magnification, you are probably the right audience.

It is also a good option for anyone who likes the idea of iron sights but struggles with the factory open sights. The aperture sight picture is easier for many shooters to use, especially as eyesight changes with age.

The only real downside is the installation consideration. If you want the rear sight mounted farther back, you may need to modify the bolt handle for clearance. Some shooters will be fine with that. Others may not want to alter the bolt handle at all. That decision is worth making before you start.

For my rifle, the modification was minor, and the improvement was worth it.

Final Thoughts on the CZ 457 Lux Tech Sights Upgrade

The CZ 457 Lux does not need much. That is part of its charm. It already has the look, feel, and handling of a classic rimfire rifle. Adding Tech Sights does not change that. Instead, it makes the iron-sight experience better.

The longer sight radius is a real improvement. The aperture sight picture is faster and easier to use. The rifle remains light, simple, and traditional, which is exactly what I wanted.

The installation does require some thought, especially if you choose to mount the rear sight farther back and modify the bolt handle for clearance. But once that is done, the result feels like it belongs on the rifle. For anyone unsure if that’s the right move, just mount it forward and shoot it that way for a while. And then decide if you want to take the next step.

For shooters who want to enjoy the CZ 457 Lux with irons instead of an optic, this is an upgrade worth considering. It will not replace a scope for precision work, and it is not supposed to. It simply makes a classic rimfire more enjoyable to shoot the classic way.

As always, I appreciate the folks at Tech Sights for sending these sights for testing and evaluation. More importantly, I appreciate that they are still making parts for shooters who enjoy iron sights. In a world where nearly every rifle seems to get scoped, dotted, or accessorized, there is still something very satisfying about a good .22 rifle, a clean aperture sight picture, and a small target downrange.

This Athlon Ares ETR Gen2 UHD 4.5-30×56 review is based on real range use, focusing on how well it holds together as you push magnification and stretch distance, rather than just listing specs.

I picked this scope up for a 6.5 Creedmoor build to reach out farther than I typically do with rimfire. While most of my shooting is inside 200 yards, I do have access to 600, so I wanted something that would hold up at higher magnification and allow for more deliberate shooting.

Specs & Features

• Magnification: 4.5–30x
• Objective Lens: 56mm
• Tube Diameter: 34mm
• Reticle: APLR12 FFP IR (MOA)
• Click Value: 0.25 MOA
• Eye Relief: 3.9″
• Field of View: 24.5 – 3.75 ft @ 100 yds
• Parallax: 25 yards to infinity
• Length: 15.3″
• Weight: 36.8 oz
• Zero Stop: Yes
• Locking Turrets: Yes
• Assembly: Assembled in Japan

Both the box and the scope itself specify Assembled in Japan, which lines up with the overall optical performance and fit and finish.

MSRP and Real-World Pricing of the Athlon Ares ETR Gen2 UHD 4.5-30×56

MSRP on the Athlon Ares ETR Gen2 typically falls in the $1,600 range, but the actual street price (retail) is usually lower. Most buyers will find it selling between $1,100 and $1,300, depending on current sales.

That puts it in a spot where it needs to justify the price jump over more affordable options.

Comparison to Lower-Priced Scopes

I have spent time behind the Vortex Venom 5-25×56 and the Arken EP5, both of which sit at a lower price point and offer less magnification range. They are solid options for the money, but they also show their limitations as you start pushing distance and magnification.

The biggest difference with the Ares ETR Gen2 is how well it holds together as you move up the magnification range. Where lower-priced scopes can start to lose clarity and become less forgiving, the Athlon remains usable and consistent. That makes it easier to stay on target and make deliberate adjustments, especially when shooting farther out.

That does not mean the cheaper scopes are bad. It just highlights what you get when you move up in price. In this case, the improvement is noticeable enough that it feels justified.

Glass Quality at High Magnification

The glass quality is one of the strongest selling points of this scope. At lower magnification, it’s sharp from edge to edge. But the point of this scope was to gain some extra magnification. As already mentioned, it maintains clarity well past the point where lesser optics tend to fall apart, which makes the upper magnification range far more usable than expected.

The eyebox does get a little less forgiving as you push toward the top end, but it never becomes frustrating. I also could not reproduce the minor chromatic aberration some users have reported, although my shooting was limited to early mornings and late afternoons, so lighting conditions were not especially harsh. In brighter midday light or against high-contrast targets, it may be more noticeable, but under my shooting conditions, it did not stand out or affect usability.

Mirage became a bigger factor once temperatures climbed, especially at higher magnification. That is not a limitation of the scope as much as a reality of shooting at distance. Dropping magnification helped, and the Ares ETR Gen2 still maintained enough clarity to stay usable even when conditions were less than ideal.

Tracking and Dialing Performance

I have yet to use a modern scope that did not track reasonably well, and the Ares ETR Gen2 is no exception. Dialing for longer shots and returning to zero was spot on, and a standard box test confirmed that.

Mounted on my Bergara 6.5 Creedmoor, the scope felt like a natural match. Nothing about the optic held the rifle back, which is exactly what you want in this category.

Hands-On Range Use With the Athlon Ares ETR Gen2 UHD 4.5-30×56

Zeroing the Ares ETR Gen2 was simple. After mounting using some Warne rings, I did a quick and rough laser zero at home. Then dialed it in at 100 yards once I got to the range. From there, it was just a matter of making small adjustments as needed.

I bought six different boxes of factory ammo to try with this rifle, and as expected, I did have to make some minor changes after switching brands. The rifle is accurate, but the point of impact changed a bit depending on the brand and bullet weight. That is not unusual, but it was a reminder that even a good rifle and scope combination still depends on consistent ammo. A few clicks got me back on track quickly and accurately.

Most of my shooting was done on public land, where access is first-come, first-served. We have flat ground with a little over 200 yards available, along with a single spot where we can shoot to a bit over 600 yards. Due to weather, timing, and access, I never had the opportunity to shoot past 300 yards during this review. That was fine for where I am with this rifle. I still need to work on my own skills and load development before stretching it out further. Based on my time behind it, though, the scope seems like a more than capable partner for that.

Turret Feel and Usability

The turrets are genuinely good, not just “good for the price.” For me, turrets that do not have a solid click you can feel and hear would be a dealbreaker, and that is not an issue here.

The clicks are crisp and positive, requiring deliberate force without feeling overly stiff. I never felt like I was going to over-dial by accident, but they also never required more effort than necessary. “Just right” is probably the best way to describe them.

I have been spoiled by another brand’s larger, easier-to-read engravings, but I had no trouble using these. The locking windage turret is also a nice touch, especially if you have ever bumped one unintentionally. No one likes that kind of surprise.

Small Details That Feel Premium

The included scope caps were noteworthy. They are aluminum, thread on securely, and the hinge design allows them to open fully until they fold flat against the scope. That may sound like a small thing, but it is exactly the kind of detail I am not used to seeing on less expensive optics.

Reticle Use in Real Shooting

The APLR12 reticle is designed for precision work, and that shows. In my case, I tend to shoot at higher magnification when stretching distance, so the reticle works well in that context.

One detail I really liked was the center dot in the reticle. It provides a precise aiming point without making the center feel cluttered. I also found the illumination useful under some lighting conditions, even though I rarely use an illuminated reticle. The illumination dial was much harder to turn than I expected, but I did appreciate the off positions between each brightness setting. The smoothness of the eyepiece more than made up for that.

With rimfire, I am more likely to use the reticle for windage and elevation holds. With this 6.5 Creedmoor setup, I found myself being more deliberate and dialing adjustments instead. That meant I did not fully lean on everything the reticle offers, but I still appreciate having those options available.

Weight and Practical Use

My rifle has a 22-inch barrel and sits in Bergara’s own BMP chassis, or a Magpul Pro 700 folding chassis with an Atlas bipod and monopod. I’m still trying to decide which I prefer. Total weight with the scope is in the 14 to 15 pound range.

In that setup, the scope’s 36.8-ounce weight is not an issue at all, since I am typically shooting from a portable table or prone. If you plan to shoot offhand often, though, that weight will be noticeable. On a rifle like mine, it feels appropriate. On a lighter rifle, it would stand out much more.

Gen 2 vs Gen 1

I have not used the Gen 1 version, so I cannot make a direct comparison. That said, the move to Japanese assembly, at least for my sample, suggests that improving overall quality may have been part of the goal. More importantly, nothing about the Gen 2 feels like a compromise. It performs the way you expect it to, without any obvious shortcomings that leave you wishing for something better.

Who This Scope Is For

I am not hunting or competing right now. I bought this rifle for longer-range shooting and to learn more about load development, and for that role, this scope makes a lot of sense. It offers a usable magnification range and comes in at a price point that feels reasonable for what you get. The weight may be a dealbreaker for hunters, and the price may turn off more casual shooters, but it fits well for someone focused on deliberate shooting and improving at distance.

Based on my experience, I would have no hesitation using it in a match. It may not be the optic someone chooses when chasing every possible advantage at the highest levels, but it feels more than capable for serious long-range work.

Is the Athlon Ares ETR Gen2 UHD 4.5-30×56 Worth It?

After doing this Athlon Ares ETR Gen2 UHD 4.5-30×56 review, I think the answer is yes… At current retail pricing, the Athlon Ares ETR Gen2 UHD 4.5-30×56 is easy to justify. You are getting clear, usable glass across the magnification range and turrets that make adjustments quick and predictable.

It does not try to be something it is not. Instead, it delivers solid performance where it matters, which makes it a strong option for anyone building out a capable long-range rifle without overspending.

If you are considering one, do not rely on a single retailer. Prices on this scope can vary, so it is worth checking multiple sources to find the best deal before buying.

As always, I’d like to thank Athlon for providing their excellent optics for my testing and evaluation. Find this scope and others on the Athlon website.

At first, it may not seem like much. However, over time, your sight picture starts to soften, and your groups begin to open up. Everything else can still feel right. Your trigger control is solid, your stance is consistent, and your ammo has not changed. Yet something is clearly off.

In most cases, this is not a gear problem. It is a focus problem. The good news is that there are several practical ways to fix it.

The Real Issue: Your Eyes Are Changing

Iron sight shooting depends on your ability to focus on one specific distance. You want to lock onto the front sight, while the rear sight and the target remain slightly out of focus.

When you are younger, your eyes shift between those distances quickly and without effort. Over time, that flexibility fades. As a result, your eye struggles to snap into focus on the front sight, even though you can still see the target clearly. That is why this problem feels so specific. It is not that your vision is bad. Instead, your eyes are having trouble focusing where you need them to.

There Is More Than One Way to Fix It

There are several ways to deal with a blurry front sight, and the right solution depends on how you shoot and what kind of setup you prefer. In many cases, shooters combine more than one of these fixes.

Fix #1: Use Reading Glasses to Shift Your Focus

For many shooters, a simple pair of low-power reading glasses makes a noticeable difference. They shift your focal point just enough to bring the front sight back into sharp focus. You do not need a strong prescription. In most cases, something around +1.00 or +1.25 is enough. The goal is not to sharpen the target. Instead, you want the front sight to look crisp again.

A simple option like Readers.com makes it easy to try a few different strengths without spending much. Keep a pair in your range bag and test what works with your natural shooting position. This is often the easiest place to start if your sight picture has started to soften. If this solves your issue, you can look for shooting glasses with built-in correction, or readers with polycarbonate lenses for an added degree of safety. Prescription shooting glasses are another option as well, though they are going to be much more expensive than some readers.

Fix #2: Upgrade to a Brighter Front Sight

Even with good vision, a plain black front sight can be hard to pick up depending on lighting conditions. If your eyes are already working harder to focus, that problem becomes more noticeable. Fiber optic sights and high-visibility front sights make the front sight easier to see and faster to pick up. They do not fix your vision. However, they reduce the effort your eye has to put in.

If you are running a rimfire pistol, there are a lot of solid options. I have covered several in my guide to Taurus TX22 upgrades, including brighter sights that improve visibility. You can also take a closer look at TX22 fiber optic sights, which are designed specifically to improve contrast and speed.

If your sight picture feels slow or inconsistent, this is often the most practical upgrade you can make.

Fix #3: Switch to a Red Dot or Green Dot

At some point, many shooters decide to stop fighting iron sights altogether. A red dot removes the need to focus on multiple distances and lets you keep your attention on the target. Instead of aligning front and rear sights, you place a dot where you want the shot to go. As a result, your eyes have a much easier job.

It is also worth noting that not everyone sees red equally well. In many cases, a green dot stands out better, especially in bright conditions. If you are considering making the switch, take a look at the best TX22 red dot optics. For example, options like the Viridian RFX42 green dot can be easier to pick up and track.

For many shooters, this ends up being the most effective long-term solution.

A Quick Note on Rifle Scopes

This article focuses on iron sights, fiber optics, and reflex-style optics. However, if a rifle scope suddenly looks off, the issue is often different. Unlike the gradual loss of front sight focus, a blurry reticle can come down to setup. In most cases, the diopter adjustment is the problem. The diopter controls how sharp the reticle appears to your eye. If it is not set correctly, your eye will constantly try to compensate. As a result, fatigue sets in quickly.

Take a minute to set it properly. Look at a blank background, adjust the diopter until the reticle snaps into focus instantly, and then leave it alone.

Small Things That Make a Difference

• Take short breaks: give your eyes a chance to reset
• Blink regularly: dry eyes can make your vision look hazy
• Pay attention to lighting: brighter conditions make it easier to maintain focus

Final Thoughts

If your front sight looks blurry, the cause is usually simple. Your eyes are not focusing the way they used to, and your setup has not adapted yet. The fix might be as easy as a pair of reading glasses. It might be a brighter front sight. Or it might be time to move to a red or green dot.

In many cases, it ends up being a combination of those things. Once you solve the focus problem, your accuracy tends to come right back. You are not losing your ability to shoot. You just need to adjust how you see the shot.

I got to spend a full day behind several different TKX22 Light Rifle builds during a recent Gunsite event hosted by TandemKross with support from Davidson’s. This was no slow-fire product demo. The event brought together experienced rimfire shooters and firearms journalists who test a lot of gear. It gave us a chance to run the rifles hard and see what they could do. That setting made one thing clear very quickly: the TKX22 is not just light. It is fast, fun, and much more capable than its minimalist feel might suggest.

First Impressions of the TKX22 Light Rifle

Obviously, the weight is the first thing everyone will notice, and it is impossible to ignore. It’s deceptively light and simple, but simple in a good way. We spend a lot of time obsessing over chassis builds, laminate stocks, oversized optics, and every possible accessory. The TKX22 strips that away and reminds you that a rifle can still be fun without being bulky or overbuilt.

That light weight is not just a gimmick. It changes the shooting experience in a very real way. Swinging from target to target feels effortless. It was easy to settle into a rhythm on steel, moving from one target to the next with almost no sense of weight. Over a full day of shooting, I never once felt like the rifle was a burden. I do not think I would tire of shooting it all afternoon. And I definitely would not dread carrying it in the field for small game hunting.

Most importantly, it is not boring. TandemKross did not just build a lightweight rifle for the sake of a low number on a spec sheet. They built something that is genuinely enjoyable to pick up and shoot.

TKX22 Light Rifle Specifications

• Caliber: .22 LR
• Barrel Length: 16.5 inches
• Barrel: Spitfire Lightweight Barrel with M-LOK-compatible aluminum shroud
• Muzzle Threads: 1/2×28
• Trigger: Manticore LITE, adjustable for pull weight and post-travel
• Trigger Pull: Approximately 3 to 3.5 pounds as delivered, adjustable from about 2 to 2.5 pounds up to 5+ pounds
• Bolt: KrossFire Bolt with Fire Starter titanium firing pin and Eagle’s Talon extractor
• Charging Handle: Spartan Skeletonized Charging Handle
• Sights: Eagle Eye fiber optic sights for M-LOK
• Stock: Magpul MOE X-22
• Magazine: DoubleKross magazine
• Weight: 3 pounds, 6 ounces unloaded
• MSRP: $1,449

Fit and Finish

As a long-time TandemKross customer, nothing about the fit and finish surprised me. Everything is nicely machined, cleanly executed, and free of sharp edges. Nothing felt unfinished or experimental.

The Magpul stock is the only non-TandemKross part in the package. It held the action snugly and inspired confidence. Which you would expect from a company with extensive experience in firearm polymers. That matters, because one of the easiest ways for a lightweight rifle to feel cheap is through poor fitment or sloppy assembly. That is not the case here.

More broadly, this rifle benefits from being a complete package built around matching in-house parts. Most custom 10/22-style rifles are a mix of parts from different manufacturers. Sometimes that works perfectly. Sometimes it does not. Tolerance stacking can create fitment issues, or worse, reliability problems that send you swapping parts until the rifle finally behaves. I have owned more expensive rifles that still needed parts changed to run the way they should have from day one. The TKX22 offers the kind of sole-source fit and reliability that a lot of pieced-together customs simply do not.

Barrel, Sights, and Modularity of the TKX22 Light Rifle

A big part of what makes the TKX22 interesting is that the lightweight feel is not coming from some stripped-down compromise. It comes from a deliberate set of parts working together.

The Spitfire Lightweight Barrel uses a thin stainless barrel inside an aluminum tensioned shroud. That keeps weight down to 11.5 ounces while maintaining rigidity. The shroud is cut for direct M-LOK mounting. So the rifle can wear TandemKross’s Eagle Eye fiber optic sights, a hand stop, or even a small light depending on how the owner wants to set it up.

As mentioned, I already have a couple of rifles with this barrel setup, so it was not new to me. But it still gets my attention every time I pick one up. It is very light, it looks cool, and it gives the rifle a lot of flexibility without making it feel overbuilt. That is a big part of the TKX22’s appeal.

The sight set itself fits the rifle’s intended role extremely well. The bright fiber optic front and rear arrangement gives a very fast, easy sight picture, and it makes a lot of sense on a rifle that could be used for speed shooting, field carry, or introducing younger shooters to rimfire. And like any good 10/22-style platform, the TKX22 Light Rifle still gives owners flexibility. Red dots, low-power optics, slings, and small accessories all make sense here. While I suspect most owners will be adding to the rifle rather than replacing major components, that is still a meaningful advantage.

Trigger Performance

The Manticore LITE trigger assembly is the one TandemKross trigger I did not already own, so I was especially curious to try it. After spending time with it, I can say it absolutely lived up to expectations.

As delivered, the trigger breaks at about 3 to 3.5 pounds – a smart middle ground between speed and safety. Even in that factory configuration, it worked very well. The design is a bit different from what I am used to, but the break is light and crisp, and feels optimized for quick follow-up shots. One of the other shooters at the event had a much faster trigger finger than I do, and he was able to run the rifle impressively fast. Just as importantly, the rifle kept up.

The adjustability should not be overlooked either. The Manticore LITE allows adjustment of both post-travel and pull weight.  The range is roughly 2 to 2.5 pounds up to more than 5 pounds. The fact that it can be adjusted so easily, with the turn of a single screw, only adds to its appeal. It can be set a little heavier to satisfy match requirements or parental preferences, or lighter when speed and precision matter more. That kind of flexibility fits the rest of the rifle perfectly.

Controls

Controls are another area where the TKX22 feels familiar in the best possible way. Anyone with time on the 10/22 platform will settle in immediately, but TandemKross has clearly refined the parts that matter.

The Manticore LITE trigger housing includes a skeletonized magazine release, Guardian Bolt Release, and an OEM-style cross-bolt safety. So none of the manual of arms feels foreign or awkward. The safety is where you expect it to be, the magazine release is easy to reach, too.  And the bolt release keeps things simple when locking the action open or sending the bolt forward again.

The Spartan Skeletonized Charging Handle is another nice touch. Its longer, curved shape makes it easier to grab, especially if you are moving quickly or wearing gloves. That may sound like a small detail, but it contributes to the overall impression that this rifle was designed by people who actually shoot these guns hard.

The DoubleKross magazine deserves mention here too. It encouraged fast shooting all day. Shoot ten rounds, flip the magazine with one hand, and shoot ten more. There was no fumbling and no interruption to the fun. I have been using this platform for more than 30 years, so familiarity certainly helps. But the design worked exactly as intended.

Reliability and the Advantage of a Complete Rifle

One of the biggest advantages here is that the TKX22 Light Rifle is not just a pile of premium parts thrown together. The rifle uses TandemKross’s own KrossFire Bolt, complete with their Fire Starter titanium firing pin and Eagle’s Talon extractor, along with the Manticore LITE trigger assembly, Spartan charging handle, and Spitfire barrel. That matters because it reduces the guesswork that often comes with piecing together a custom 10/22 from different manufacturers. Instead of hoping everything plays nicely together, you are getting a rifle designed as a system from the start.

To the rifle’s credit, it never choked while being shot hard. We did take a break during the event to give the rifles a quick wipe and maybe a drop or two of oil.  Given the volume of ammo, the pace of fire, and the added blowback from running suppressed, I think they held up just fine.

That reliability matters even more on a rifle like this because it is clearly meant to be fun. When a rifle is this fast, this light, and this enjoyable to shoot, the last thing you want is a bunch of fiddly custom-build nonsense getting in the way. The TKX22 avoided that completely.

Optics, Suppressors, and Balance

Despite the rifle’s extremely low weight, optics did not upset the balance at all. That makes sense, because on a 10/22-style rifle, the optic sits close to the center of mass. A small reflex sight felt right at home, and even the scoped version with 1-6x magnification was still plenty light and easy to handle.

The same held true with a suppressor. The added weight at the muzzle barely changed the handling, but it added a lot to the overall enjoyment. Light rifles and suppressors just seem made for each other. The combination makes for a soft, comfortable, easy-shooting setup that adults and kids could enjoy for hours.

After shooting the different configurations, I could not honestly pick a favorite. My own builds with this style of barrel use the fiber optic sights. So having a red dot was a nice change. The scoped version was really nice too. If I were setting one up for myself, I would probably stick with either the fiber optics or a small reflex sight.

TKX22 Light Rifle Accuracy and Real-World Shooting

For a rifle that feels this light and minimalist, the TKX22 Light Rifle was more capable at distance than some people might expect.

We were shooting a mix of CCI Standard Velocity, CCI Mini Mags, and some Aguila. The silhouette targets were set at 100 and 200 yards.  Most of the closer plates and spinners were at 50 yards or less.

Hitting the small silhouette at 200 yards surprised me a little. Once we adjusted for bullet drop and called the wind, it was easy enough to land hits. At 50 yards and in, shooting offhand, it was pretty much a laser on steel. A fast laser. The weight never fought you as you moved from target to target, and that made it extremely easy to stay engaged and keep shooting.

Who the TKX22 Light Rifle Is For

I see this rifle making sense for several different kinds of buyers.

Given TandemKross’s Steel Challenge background, it is obvious they had speed-oriented competition in mind. That said, this is not a one-note competition rifle. If you are shopping for a semi-auto rifle for your kids, the low weight is a huge advantage. Hikers, backpackers, and anyone planning to carry a .22 for extended periods in the field will appreciate both the lack of weight and the simplicity of the fiber optic sights. Add a sling and it becomes even more practical for field carry. It also makes perfect sense for the shooter who wants a full custom rifle but has no interest in piecing one together part by part.

That may be the TKX22’s biggest strength. It can make sense for very different users without feeling compromised.

Price and Value

At an MSRP of $1,449, the TKX22 Light Rifle is not an inexpensive rifle. That is going to be the sticking point for some buyers, and that is fair. But context matters.

If you look at what a true custom 10/22-style rifle costs, whether you build it yourself or buy one complete, that number starts to look a lot more reasonable. There has already been some comparison to another company’s light rifle, and the TKX22 stacks up well. It is roughly two pounds lighter, more than $200 less, includes a DoubleKross magazine, and gives the user an adjustable trigger. That does not make it cheap, but it does make it look like a rifle offering more for less money.

For me, the bigger value proposition is that this is a turn-key custom from a trusted name, and TandemKross has clearly done its homework. Instead of spending time and money chasing the right parts combination, you are getting a complete rifle that already feels sorted out.

Options

The TKX22 Light Rifle will be offered in several color combinations, including:

• OD Green with black accents and a black barrel
• FDE with black accents and a black barrel
• Black with black accents and a stainless barrel
• Stealth Grey with black accents and a stainless barrel

Final Thoughts

The biggest takeaway for me is that the TandemKross TKX22 Light Rifle offers much more than a low number on a spec sheet. It is fast, comfortable, reliable, and flexible enough to fit several different roles.

More importantly, it is fun. You will probably grin the first time you pick it up, and there is a good chance you will still be grinning, at least internally, once you start running it on steel. That is when the appeal becomes obvious.

By the end of the day, the case for the TKX22 Light Rifle felt pretty clear. It is not inexpensive, but it is well-made, thoughtfully designed, and a strong value when compared to the closest comparable options.

If you want the experience of a custom rimfire without the hassle of building one, the TKX22 makes a compelling case for itself. It is light without being boring, refined without being fussy, and flexible enough to serve everything from speed games to small game hunting to a very long afternoon of grinning your way through a pile of ammo.

The TKX22 Light Rifle will be available through dealers via Davidson’s, the distributor, and through the Gallery of Guns website.

Thanks again to TandemKross, Davidson’s, and Gunsite for making the event possible and for giving a group of dedicated rimfire shooters the chance to spend the day doing what rimfire shooters do best.